diff options
author | Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> | 2007-01-02 13:52:30 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> | 2007-07-13 08:06:15 -0700 |
commit | 91c00924846a0034020451c280c76baa4299f9dc (patch) | |
tree | 7124ed6706937b793a10c37a861c5fc0f2e5b348 /include/linux/raid | |
parent | 45b4233caac05da0118b608a9fc2a40a9fc580cd (diff) | |
download | op-kernel-dev-91c00924846a0034020451c280c76baa4299f9dc.zip op-kernel-dev-91c00924846a0034020451c280c76baa4299f9dc.tar.gz |
md: raid5_run_ops - run stripe operations outside sh->lock
When the raid acceleration work was proposed, Neil laid out the following
attack plan:
1/ move the xor and copy operations outside spin_lock(&sh->lock)
2/ find/implement an asynchronous offload api
The raid5_run_ops routine uses the asynchronous offload api (async_tx) and
the stripe_operations member of a stripe_head to carry out xor+copy
operations asynchronously, outside the lock.
To perform operations outside the lock a new set of state flags is needed
to track new requests, in-flight requests, and completed requests. In this
new model handle_stripe is tasked with scanning the stripe_head for work,
updating the stripe_operations structure, and finally dropping the lock and
calling raid5_run_ops for processing. The following flags outline the
requests that handle_stripe can make of raid5_run_ops:
STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL
- copy data into request buffers to satisfy a read request
STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE_BLK
- generate a missing block in the cache from the other blocks
STRIPE_OP_PREXOR
- subtract existing data as part of the read-modify-write process
STRIPE_OP_BIODRAIN
- copy data out of request buffers to satisfy a write request
STRIPE_OP_POSTXOR
- recalculate parity for new data that has entered the cache
STRIPE_OP_CHECK
- verify that the parity is correct
STRIPE_OP_IO
- submit i/o to the member disks (note this was already performed outside
the stripe lock, but it made sense to add it as an operation type
The flow is:
1/ handle_stripe sets STRIPE_OP_* in sh->ops.pending
2/ raid5_run_ops reads sh->ops.pending, sets sh->ops.ack, and submits the
operation to the async_tx api
3/ async_tx triggers the completion callback routine to set
sh->ops.complete and release the stripe
4/ handle_stripe runs again to finish the operation and optionally submit
new operations that were previously blocked
Note this patch just defines raid5_run_ops, subsequent commits (one per
major operation type) modify handle_stripe to take advantage of this
routine.
Changelog:
* removed ops_complete_biodrain in favor of ops_complete_postxor and
ops_complete_write.
* removed the raid5_run_ops workqueue
* call bi_end_io for reads in ops_complete_biofill, saves a call to
handle_stripe
* explicitly handle the 2-disk raid5 case (xor becomes memcpy), Neil Brown
* fix race between async engines and bi_end_io call for reads, Neil Brown
* remove unnecessary spin_lock from ops_complete_biofill
* remove test_and_set/test_and_clear BUG_ONs, Neil Brown
* remove explicit interrupt handling for channel switching, this feature
was absorbed (i.e. it is now implicit) by the async_tx api
* use return_io in ops_complete_biofill
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-By: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/raid')
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/raid/raid5.h | 81 |
1 files changed, 78 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/raid/raid5.h b/include/linux/raid/raid5.h index b99d354..6fb9d94 100644 --- a/include/linux/raid/raid5.h +++ b/include/linux/raid/raid5.h @@ -116,13 +116,46 @@ * attach a request to an active stripe (add_stripe_bh()) * lockdev attach-buffer unlockdev * handle a stripe (handle_stripe()) - * lockstripe clrSTRIPE_HANDLE ... (lockdev check-buffers unlockdev) .. change-state .. record io needed unlockstripe schedule io + * lockstripe clrSTRIPE_HANDLE ... + * (lockdev check-buffers unlockdev) .. + * change-state .. + * record io/ops needed unlockstripe schedule io/ops * release an active stripe (release_stripe()) * lockdev if (!--cnt) { if STRIPE_HANDLE, add to handle_list else add to inactive-list } unlockdev * * The refcount counts each thread that have activated the stripe, * plus raid5d if it is handling it, plus one for each active request - * on a cached buffer. + * on a cached buffer, and plus one if the stripe is undergoing stripe + * operations. + * + * Stripe operations are performed outside the stripe lock, + * the stripe operations are: + * -copying data between the stripe cache and user application buffers + * -computing blocks to save a disk access, or to recover a missing block + * -updating the parity on a write operation (reconstruct write and + * read-modify-write) + * -checking parity correctness + * -running i/o to disk + * These operations are carried out by raid5_run_ops which uses the async_tx + * api to (optionally) offload operations to dedicated hardware engines. + * When requesting an operation handle_stripe sets the pending bit for the + * operation and increments the count. raid5_run_ops is then run whenever + * the count is non-zero. + * There are some critical dependencies between the operations that prevent some + * from being requested while another is in flight. + * 1/ Parity check operations destroy the in cache version of the parity block, + * so we prevent parity dependent operations like writes and compute_blocks + * from starting while a check is in progress. Some dma engines can perform + * the check without damaging the parity block, in these cases the parity + * block is re-marked up to date (assuming the check was successful) and is + * not re-read from disk. + * 2/ When a write operation is requested we immediately lock the affected + * blocks, and mark them as not up to date. This causes new read requests + * to be held off, as well as parity checks and compute block operations. + * 3/ Once a compute block operation has been requested handle_stripe treats + * that block as if it is up to date. raid5_run_ops guaruntees that any + * operation that is dependent on the compute block result is initiated after + * the compute block completes. */ struct stripe_head { @@ -136,11 +169,26 @@ struct stripe_head { spinlock_t lock; int bm_seq; /* sequence number for bitmap flushes */ int disks; /* disks in stripe */ + /* stripe_operations + * @pending - pending ops flags (set for request->issue->complete) + * @ack - submitted ops flags (set for issue->complete) + * @complete - completed ops flags (set for complete) + * @target - STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE_BLK target + * @count - raid5_runs_ops is set to run when this is non-zero + */ + struct stripe_operations { + unsigned long pending; + unsigned long ack; + unsigned long complete; + int target; + int count; + u32 zero_sum_result; + } ops; struct r5dev { struct bio req; struct bio_vec vec; struct page *page; - struct bio *toread, *towrite, *written; + struct bio *toread, *read, *towrite, *written; sector_t sector; /* sector of this page */ unsigned long flags; } dev[1]; /* allocated with extra space depending of RAID geometry */ @@ -174,6 +222,15 @@ struct r6_state { #define R5_ReWrite 9 /* have tried to over-write the readerror */ #define R5_Expanded 10 /* This block now has post-expand data */ +#define R5_Wantcompute 11 /* compute_block in progress treat as + * uptodate + */ +#define R5_Wantfill 12 /* dev->toread contains a bio that needs + * filling + */ +#define R5_Wantprexor 13 /* distinguish blocks ready for rmw from + * other "towrites" + */ /* * Write method */ @@ -196,6 +253,24 @@ struct r6_state { #define STRIPE_EXPAND_SOURCE 10 #define STRIPE_EXPAND_READY 11 /* + * Operations flags (in issue order) + */ +#define STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL 0 +#define STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE_BLK 1 +#define STRIPE_OP_PREXOR 2 +#define STRIPE_OP_BIODRAIN 3 +#define STRIPE_OP_POSTXOR 4 +#define STRIPE_OP_CHECK 5 +#define STRIPE_OP_IO 6 + +/* modifiers to the base operations + * STRIPE_OP_MOD_REPAIR_PD - compute the parity block and write it back + * STRIPE_OP_MOD_DMA_CHECK - parity is not corrupted by the check + */ +#define STRIPE_OP_MOD_REPAIR_PD 7 +#define STRIPE_OP_MOD_DMA_CHECK 8 + +/* * Plugging: * * To improve write throughput, we need to delay the handling of some |