Btrfs: avoid taking the chunk_mutex in do_chunk_alloc

Everytime we try to allocate disk space we try and see if we can pre-emptively
allocate a chunk, but in the common case we don't allocate anything, so there is
no sense in taking the chunk_mutex at all.  So instead if we are allocating a
chunk, mark it in the space_info so we don't get two people trying to allocate
at the same time.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>

2 files changed, 28 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 0d00a07..2e61fe1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -740,8 +740,10 @@ struct btrfs_space_info {
 	 */
 	unsigned long reservation_progress;
 
-	int full;		/* indicates that we cannot allocate any more
+	int full:1;		/* indicates that we cannot allocate any more
 				   chunks for this space */
+	int chunk_alloc:1;	/* set if we are allocating a chunk */
+
 	int force_alloc;	/* set if we need to force a chunk alloc for
 				   this space */
 
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 2647948..31f33ba 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -3039,6 +3039,7 @@ static int update_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, u64 flags,
 	found->bytes_may_use = 0;
 	found->full = 0;
 	found->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE;
+	found->chunk_alloc = 0;
 	*space_info = found;
 	list_add_rcu(&found->list, &info->space_info);
 	atomic_set(&found->caching_threads, 0);
@@ -3318,10 +3319,9 @@ static int do_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 {
 	struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = extent_root->fs_info;
+	int wait_for_alloc = 0;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
-
 	flags = btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile(extent_root, flags);
 
 	space_info = __find_space_info(extent_root->fs_info, flags);
@@ -3332,21 +3332,40 @@ static int do_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	}
 	BUG_ON(!space_info);
 
+again:
 	spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
 	if (space_info->force_alloc)
 		force = space_info->force_alloc;
 	if (space_info->full) {
 		spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
-		goto out;
+		return 0;
 	}
 
 	if (!should_alloc_chunk(extent_root, space_info, alloc_bytes, force)) {
 		spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
-		goto out;
+		return 0;
+	} else if (space_info->chunk_alloc) {
+		wait_for_alloc = 1;
+	} else {
+		space_info->chunk_alloc = 1;
 	}
 
 	spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
 
+	mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
+
+	/*
+	 * The chunk_mutex is held throughout the entirety of a chunk
+	 * allocation, so once we've acquired the chunk_mutex we know that the
+	 * other guy is done and we need to recheck and see if we should
+	 * allocate.
+	 */
+	if (wait_for_alloc) {
+		mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
+		wait_for_alloc = 0;
+		goto again;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we have mixed data/metadata chunks we want to make sure we keep
 	 * allocating mixed chunks instead of individual chunks.
@@ -3372,9 +3391,10 @@ static int do_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		space_info->full = 1;
 	else
 		ret = 1;
+
 	space_info->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE;
+	space_info->chunk_alloc = 0;
 	spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
-out:
 	mutex_unlock(&extent_root->fs_info->chunk_mutex);
 	return ret;
 }