fsnotify: destroy marks with call_srcu instead of dedicated thread

At the time that this code was originally written, call_srcu didn't
exist, so this thread was required to ensure that we waited for that
SRCU grace period to settle before finally freeing the object.

It does exist now however and we can much more efficiently use call_srcu
to handle this.  That also allows us to potentially use srcu_barrier to
ensure that they are all of the callbacks have run before proceeding.
In order to conserve space, we union the rcu_head with the g_list.

This will be necessary for nfsd which will allocate marks from a
dedicated slabcache.  We have to be able to ensure that all of the
objects are destroyed before destroying the cache.  That's fairly

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 14 insertions, 52 deletions

diff --git a/fs/notify/mark.c b/fs/notify/mark.c
index fc0df44..cfcbf11 100644
--- a/fs/notify/mark.c
+++ b/fs/notify/mark.c
@@ -92,9 +92,6 @@
 #include "fsnotify.h"
 
 struct srcu_struct fsnotify_mark_srcu;
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(destroy_lock);
-static LIST_HEAD(destroy_list);
-static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(destroy_waitq);
 
 void fsnotify_get_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
 {
@@ -168,10 +165,19 @@ void fsnotify_detach_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
 	atomic_dec(&group->num_marks);
 }
 
+static void
+fsnotify_mark_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
+{
+	struct fsnotify_mark	*mark;
+
+	mark = container_of(rcu, struct fsnotify_mark, g_rcu);
+	fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
+}
+
 /*
- * Free fsnotify mark. The freeing is actually happening from a kthread which
- * first waits for srcu period end. Caller must have a reference to the mark
- * or be protected by fsnotify_mark_srcu.
+ * Free fsnotify mark. The freeing is actually happening from a call_srcu
+ * callback. Caller must have a reference to the mark or be protected by
+ * fsnotify_mark_srcu.
  */
 void fsnotify_free_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
 {
@@ -186,10 +192,7 @@ void fsnotify_free_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
 	mark->flags &= ~FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ALIVE;
 	spin_unlock(&mark->lock);
 
-	spin_lock(&destroy_lock);
-	list_add(&mark->g_list, &destroy_list);
-	spin_unlock(&destroy_lock);
-	wake_up(&destroy_waitq);
+	call_srcu(&fsnotify_mark_srcu, &mark->g_rcu, fsnotify_mark_free_rcu);
 
 	/*
 	 * Some groups like to know that marks are being freed.  This is a
@@ -385,11 +388,7 @@ err:
 
 	spin_unlock(&mark->lock);
 
-	spin_lock(&destroy_lock);
-	list_add(&mark->g_list, &destroy_list);
-	spin_unlock(&destroy_lock);
-	wake_up(&destroy_waitq);
-
+	call_srcu(&fsnotify_mark_srcu, &mark->g_rcu, fsnotify_mark_free_rcu);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -492,40 +491,3 @@ void fsnotify_init_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark,
 	atomic_set(&mark->refcnt, 1);
 	mark->free_mark = free_mark;
 }
-
-static int fsnotify_mark_destroy(void *ignored)
-{
-	struct fsnotify_mark *mark, *next;
-	struct list_head private_destroy_list;
-
-	for (;;) {
-		spin_lock(&destroy_lock);
-		/* exchange the list head */
-		list_replace_init(&destroy_list, &private_destroy_list);
-		spin_unlock(&destroy_lock);
-
-		synchronize_srcu(&fsnotify_mark_srcu);
-
-		list_for_each_entry_safe(mark, next, &private_destroy_list, g_list) {
-			list_del_init(&mark->g_list);
-			fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
-		}
-
-		wait_event_interruptible(destroy_waitq, !list_empty(&destroy_list));
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int __init fsnotify_mark_init(void)
-{
-	struct task_struct *thread;
-
-	thread = kthread_run(fsnotify_mark_destroy, NULL,
-			     "fsnotify_mark");
-	if (IS_ERR(thread))
-		panic("unable to start fsnotify mark destruction thread.");
-
-	return 0;
-}
-device_initcall(fsnotify_mark_init);