[JFFS2] Invert last argument of jffs2_gc_fetch_inode(), make it boolean.

We don't actually care about nlink; we only care whether the inode in
question is unlinked or not.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/fs/jffs2/fs.c b/fs/jffs2/fs.c
index 3eb1c84..e14b185 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/fs.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/fs.c
@@ -586,11 +586,12 @@ void jffs2_gc_release_inode(struct jffs2_sb_info *c,
 }
 
 struct jffs2_inode_info *jffs2_gc_fetch_inode(struct jffs2_sb_info *c,
-						     int inum, int nlink)
+					      int inum, int unlinked)
 {
 	struct inode *inode;
 	struct jffs2_inode_cache *ic;
-	if (!nlink) {
+
+	if (unlinked) {
 		/* The inode has zero nlink but its nodes weren't yet marked
 		   obsolete. This has to be because we're still waiting for
 		   the final (close() and) iput() to happen.
@@ -638,8 +639,8 @@ struct jffs2_inode_info *jffs2_gc_fetch_inode(struct jffs2_sb_info *c,
 			return ERR_CAST(inode);
 	}
 	if (is_bad_inode(inode)) {
-		printk(KERN_NOTICE "Eep. read_inode() failed for ino #%u. nlink %d\n",
-		       inum, nlink);
+		printk(KERN_NOTICE "Eep. read_inode() failed for ino #%u. unlinked %d\n",
+		       inum, unlinked);
 		/* NB. This will happen again. We need to do something appropriate here. */
 		iput(inode);
 		return ERR_PTR(-EIO);