Merge branch 'for_linus' into for_linus_merged

Conflicts:
	fs/ext4/ioctl.c

3 files changed, 43 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/commit.c b/fs/jbd2/commit.c
index 68d704d..5069b84 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/commit.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/commit.c
@@ -430,6 +430,12 @@ void jbd2_journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal)
 	jbd_debug(3, "JBD2: commit phase 1\n");
 
 	/*
+	 * Clear revoked flag to reflect there is no revoked buffers
+	 * in the next transaction which is going to be started.
+	 */
+	jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags(journal);
+
+	/*
 	 * Switch to a new revoke table.
 	 */
 	jbd2_journal_switch_revoke_table(journal);
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
index 69fd935..30b2867 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
@@ -47,6 +47,10 @@
  *   overwriting the new data.  We don't even need to clear the revoke
  *   bit here.
  *
+ * We cache revoke status of a buffer in the current transaction in b_states
+ * bits.  As the name says, revokevalid flag indicates that the cached revoke
+ * status of a buffer is valid and we can rely on the cached status.
+ *
  * Revoke information on buffers is a tri-state value:
  *
  * RevokeValid clear:	no cached revoke status, need to look it up
@@ -478,6 +482,36 @@ int jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke(handle_t *handle, struct journal_head *jh)
 	return did_revoke;
 }
 
+/*
+ * journal_clear_revoked_flag clears revoked flag of buffers in
+ * revoke table to reflect there is no revoked buffers in the next
+ * transaction which is going to be started.
+ */
+void jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags(journal_t *journal)
+{
+	struct jbd2_revoke_table_s *revoke = journal->j_revoke;
+	int i = 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < revoke->hash_size; i++) {
+		struct list_head *hash_list;
+		struct list_head *list_entry;
+		hash_list = &revoke->hash_table[i];
+
+		list_for_each(list_entry, hash_list) {
+			struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *record;
+			struct buffer_head *bh;
+			record = (struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *)list_entry;
+			bh = __find_get_block(journal->j_fs_dev,
+					      record->blocknr,
+					      journal->j_blocksize);
+			if (bh) {
+				clear_buffer_revoked(bh);
+				__brelse(bh);
+			}
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 /* journal_switch_revoke table select j_revoke for next transaction
  * we do not want to suspend any processing until all revokes are
  * written -bzzz
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
index a0e41a4..35ae096 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
@@ -517,12 +517,13 @@ void jbd2_journal_lock_updates(journal_t *journal)
 			break;
 
 		spin_lock(&transaction->t_handle_lock);
+		prepare_to_wait(&journal->j_wait_updates, &wait,
+				TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 		if (!atomic_read(&transaction->t_updates)) {
 			spin_unlock(&transaction->t_handle_lock);
+			finish_wait(&journal->j_wait_updates, &wait);
 			break;
 		}
-		prepare_to_wait(&journal->j_wait_updates, &wait,
-				TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 		spin_unlock(&transaction->t_handle_lock);
 		write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
 		schedule();