diff options
| author | Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> | 2014-02-08 15:33:08 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> | 2014-02-14 13:44:32 -0800 |
| commit | a9d2d4adb6a87e515912a7033b227acbd9c8835e (patch) | |
| tree | 11862ae51ee70afa2081146c16d84481c5c67ef5 /fs/btrfs/super.c | |
| parent | 11bcac89c0d73dea42f1cb8646b532035796a5d6 (diff) | |
| download | op-kernel-dev-a9d2d4adb6a87e515912a7033b227acbd9c8835e.zip op-kernel-dev-a9d2d4adb6a87e515912a7033b227acbd9c8835e.tar.gz | |
Btrfs: fix a lockdep warning when cleaning up aborted transaction
Given now we have 2 spinlock for management of delayed refs,
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y helped me find this,
[ 4723.413809] BUG: spinlock wrong CPU on CPU#1, btrfs-transacti/2258
[ 4723.414882] lock: 0xffff880048377670, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: btrfs-transacti/2258, .owner_cpu: 2
[ 4723.417146] CPU: 1 PID: 2258 Comm: btrfs-transacti Tainted: G W O 3.12.0+ #4
[ 4723.421321] Call Trace:
[ 4723.421872] [<ffffffff81680fe7>] dump_stack+0x54/0x74
[ 4723.422753] [<ffffffff81681093>] spin_dump+0x8c/0x91
[ 4723.424979] [<ffffffff816810b9>] spin_bug+0x21/0x26
[ 4723.425846] [<ffffffff81323956>] do_raw_spin_unlock+0x66/0x90
[ 4723.434424] [<ffffffff81689bf7>] _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40
[ 4723.438747] [<ffffffffa015da9e>] btrfs_cleanup_one_transaction+0x35e/0x710 [btrfs]
[ 4723.443321] [<ffffffffa015df54>] btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x104/0x570 [btrfs]
[ 4723.444692] [<ffffffff810c1b5d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xfd/0x1c0
[ 4723.450336] [<ffffffff810c1c2d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 4723.451332] [<ffffffffa015e5ee>] transaction_kthread+0x22e/0x270 [btrfs]
[ 4723.452543] [<ffffffffa015e3c0>] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x570/0x570 [btrfs]
[ 4723.457833] [<ffffffff81079efa>] kthread+0xea/0xf0
[ 4723.458990] [<ffffffff81079e10>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140
[ 4723.460133] [<ffffffff81692aac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[ 4723.460865] [<ffffffff81079e10>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140
[ 4723.496521] ------------[ cut here ]------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason is that we get to call cond_resched_lock(&head_ref->lock) while
still holding @delayed_refs->lock.
So it's different with __btrfs_run_delayed_refs(), where we do drop-acquire
dance before and after actually processing delayed refs.
Here we don't drop the lock, others are not able to add new delayed refs to
head_ref, so cond_resched_lock(&head_ref->lock) is not necessary here.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/super.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
