scsi: mpt3sas: Increased/Additional MSIX support for SAS35 devices.

For SAS35 devices MSIX vectors are inceased to 128 from 96. To support this
Reply post host index register count is increased to 16. Also variable
msix96_vector is replaced with combined_reply_queue and variable
combined_reply_index_count is added to set different values for SAS3 and
SAS35 devices.

Signed-off-by: Chaitra P B <chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Suganath Prabu S <suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
index 9ad7f7c..43cdc02 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
@@ -1078,7 +1078,7 @@ _base_interrupt(int irq, void *bus_id)
 	 * new reply host index value in ReplyPostIndex Field and msix_index
 	 * value in MSIxIndex field.
 	 */
-	if (ioc->msix96_vector)
+	if (ioc->combined_reply_queue)
 		writel(reply_q->reply_post_host_index | ((msix_index  & 7) <<
 			MPI2_RPHI_MSIX_INDEX_SHIFT),
 			ioc->replyPostRegisterIndex[msix_index/8]);
@@ -2052,7 +2052,7 @@ mpt3sas_base_unmap_resources(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc)
 	_base_free_irq(ioc);
 	_base_disable_msix(ioc);
 
-	if (ioc->msix96_vector) {
+	if (ioc->combined_reply_queue) {
 		kfree(ioc->replyPostRegisterIndex);
 		ioc->replyPostRegisterIndex = NULL;
 	}
@@ -2162,7 +2162,7 @@ mpt3sas_base_map_resources(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc)
 	/* Use the Combined reply queue feature only for SAS3 C0 & higher
 	 * revision HBAs and also only when reply queue count is greater than 8
 	 */
-	if (ioc->msix96_vector && ioc->reply_queue_count > 8) {
+	if (ioc->combined_reply_queue && ioc->reply_queue_count > 8) {
 		/* Determine the Supplemental Reply Post Host Index Registers
 		 * Addresse. Supplemental Reply Post Host Index Registers
 		 * starts at offset MPI25_SUP_REPLY_POST_HOST_INDEX_OFFSET and
@@ -2170,7 +2170,7 @@ mpt3sas_base_map_resources(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc)
 		 * MPT3_SUP_REPLY_POST_HOST_INDEX_REG_OFFSET from previous one.
 		 */
 		ioc->replyPostRegisterIndex = kcalloc(
-		     MPT3_SUP_REPLY_POST_HOST_INDEX_REG_COUNT,
+		     ioc->combined_reply_index_count,
 		     sizeof(resource_size_t *), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!ioc->replyPostRegisterIndex) {
 			dfailprintk(ioc, printk(MPT3SAS_FMT
@@ -2180,14 +2180,14 @@ mpt3sas_base_map_resources(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc)
 			goto out_fail;
 		}
 
-		for (i = 0; i < MPT3_SUP_REPLY_POST_HOST_INDEX_REG_COUNT; i++) {
+		for (i = 0; i < ioc->combined_reply_index_count; i++) {
 			ioc->replyPostRegisterIndex[i] = (resource_size_t *)
 			     ((u8 *)&ioc->chip->Doorbell +
 			     MPI25_SUP_REPLY_POST_HOST_INDEX_OFFSET +
 			     (i * MPT3_SUP_REPLY_POST_HOST_INDEX_REG_OFFSET));
 		}
 	} else
-		ioc->msix96_vector = 0;
+		ioc->combined_reply_queue = 0;
 
 	if (ioc->is_warpdrive) {
 		ioc->reply_post_host_index[0] = (resource_size_t __iomem *)
@@ -5140,7 +5140,7 @@ _base_make_ioc_operational(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc)
 
 	/* initialize reply post host index */
 	list_for_each_entry(reply_q, &ioc->reply_queue_list, list) {
-		if (ioc->msix96_vector)
+		if (ioc->combined_reply_queue)
 			writel((reply_q->msix_index & 7)<<
 			   MPI2_RPHI_MSIX_INDEX_SHIFT,
 			   ioc->replyPostRegisterIndex[reply_q->msix_index/8]);