HID: wiimote: fix FF deadlock

The input core has an internal spinlock that is acquired during event
injection via input_event() and friends but also held during FF callbacks.
That means, there is no way to share a lock between event-injection and FF
handling. Unfortunately, this is what is required for wiimote state
tracking and what we do with state.lock and input->lock.

This deadlock can be triggered when using continuous data reporting and FF
on a wiimote device at the same time. I takes me at least 30m of
stress-testing to trigger it but users reported considerably shorter
times (http://bpaste.net/show/132504/) when using some gaming-console
emulators.

The real problem is that we have two copies of internal state, one in the
wiimote objects and the other in the input device. As the input-lock is
not supposed to be accessed from outside of input-core, we have no other
chance than offloading FF handling into a worker. This actually works
pretty nice and also allows to implictly merge fast rumble changes into a
single request.

Due to the 3-layered workers (rumble+queue+l2cap) this might reduce FF
responsiveness. Initial tests were fine so lets fix the race first and if
it turns out to be too slow we can always handle FF out-of-band and skip
the queue-worker.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.11+
Reported-by: Thomas Schneider
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

1 files changed, 29 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-wiimote-modules.c b/drivers/hid/hid-wiimote-modules.c
index 2e7d644..71adf9e 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-wiimote-modules.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-wiimote-modules.c
@@ -119,12 +119,22 @@ static const struct wiimod_ops wiimod_keys = {
  * the rumble motor, this flag shouldn't be set.
  */
 
+/* used by wiimod_rumble and wiipro_rumble */
+static void wiimod_rumble_worker(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct wiimote_data *wdata = container_of(work, struct wiimote_data,
+						  rumble_worker);
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&wdata->state.lock);
+	wiiproto_req_rumble(wdata, wdata->state.cache_rumble);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&wdata->state.lock);
+}
+
 static int wiimod_rumble_play(struct input_dev *dev, void *data,
 			      struct ff_effect *eff)
 {
 	struct wiimote_data *wdata = input_get_drvdata(dev);
 	__u8 value;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	/*
 	 * The wiimote supports only a single rumble motor so if any magnitude
@@ -137,9 +147,10 @@ static int wiimod_rumble_play(struct input_dev *dev, void *data,
 	else
 		value = 0;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&wdata->state.lock, flags);
-	wiiproto_req_rumble(wdata, value);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wdata->state.lock, flags);
+	/* Locking state.lock here might deadlock with input_event() calls.
+	 * schedule_work acts as barrier. Merging multiple changes is fine. */
+	wdata->state.cache_rumble = value;
+	schedule_work(&wdata->rumble_worker);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -147,6 +158,8 @@ static int wiimod_rumble_play(struct input_dev *dev, void *data,
 static int wiimod_rumble_probe(const struct wiimod_ops *ops,
 			       struct wiimote_data *wdata)
 {
+	INIT_WORK(&wdata->rumble_worker, wiimod_rumble_worker);
+
 	set_bit(FF_RUMBLE, wdata->input->ffbit);
 	if (input_ff_create_memless(wdata->input, NULL, wiimod_rumble_play))
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -159,6 +172,8 @@ static void wiimod_rumble_remove(const struct wiimod_ops *ops,
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	cancel_work_sync(&wdata->rumble_worker);
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&wdata->state.lock, flags);
 	wiiproto_req_rumble(wdata, 0);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wdata->state.lock, flags);
@@ -1731,7 +1746,6 @@ static int wiimod_pro_play(struct input_dev *dev, void *data,
 {
 	struct wiimote_data *wdata = input_get_drvdata(dev);
 	__u8 value;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	/*
 	 * The wiimote supports only a single rumble motor so if any magnitude
@@ -1744,9 +1758,10 @@ static int wiimod_pro_play(struct input_dev *dev, void *data,
 	else
 		value = 0;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&wdata->state.lock, flags);
-	wiiproto_req_rumble(wdata, value);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wdata->state.lock, flags);
+	/* Locking state.lock here might deadlock with input_event() calls.
+	 * schedule_work acts as barrier. Merging multiple changes is fine. */
+	wdata->state.cache_rumble = value;
+	schedule_work(&wdata->rumble_worker);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1756,6 +1771,8 @@ static int wiimod_pro_probe(const struct wiimod_ops *ops,
 {
 	int ret, i;
 
+	INIT_WORK(&wdata->rumble_worker, wiimod_rumble_worker);
+
 	wdata->extension.input = input_allocate_device();
 	if (!wdata->extension.input)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -1817,12 +1834,13 @@ static void wiimod_pro_remove(const struct wiimod_ops *ops,
 	if (!wdata->extension.input)
 		return;
 
+	input_unregister_device(wdata->extension.input);
+	wdata->extension.input = NULL;
+	cancel_work_sync(&wdata->rumble_worker);
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&wdata->state.lock, flags);
 	wiiproto_req_rumble(wdata, 0);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wdata->state.lock, flags);
-
-	input_unregister_device(wdata->extension.input);
-	wdata->extension.input = NULL;
 }
 
 static const struct wiimod_ops wiimod_pro = {