Merge branch 'for-next' into for-linus

Conflicts:
	Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
	arch/arm/mach-u300/include/mach/debug-macro.S
	drivers/net/qlge/qlge_ethtool.c
	drivers/net/qlge/qlge_main.c
	drivers/net/typhoon.c

4 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c
index 71247da..75bceee7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c
@@ -3545,7 +3545,7 @@ int nouveau_bios_parse_lvds_table(struct drm_device *dev, int pxclk, bool *dl, b
 	 * at which modes should be set up in the dual link style.
 	 *
 	 * Following the header, the BMP (ver 0xa) table has several records,
-	 * indexed by a seperate xlat table, indexed in turn by the fp strap in
+	 * indexed by a separate xlat table, indexed in turn by the fp strap in
 	 * EXTDEV_BOOT. Each record had a config byte, followed by 6 script
 	 * numbers for use by INIT_SUB which controlled panel init and power,
 	 * and finally a dword of ms to sleep between power off and on
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
index 5f8d987..4b9aaf2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ struct drm_nouveau_private {
 	uint32_t ramro_offset;
 	uint32_t ramro_size;
 
-	/* base physical adresses */
+	/* base physical addresses */
 	uint64_t fb_phys;
 	uint64_t fb_available_size;
 	uint64_t fb_mappable_pages;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_state.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_state.c
index 3c32f84..40ab6d9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_state.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_state.c
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@ static void radeon_cp_dispatch_clear(struct drm_device * dev,
 					/* judging by the first tile offset needed, could possibly
 					   directly address/clear 4x4 tiles instead of 8x2 * 4x4
 					   macro tiles, though would still need clear mask for
-					   right/bottom if truely 4x4 granularity is desired ? */
+					   right/bottom if truly 4x4 granularity is desired ? */
 					OUT_RING(tileoffset * 16);
 					/* the number of tiles to clear */
 					OUT_RING(nrtilesx + 1);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c
index 5935b88..34079f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ irqreturn_t via_driver_irq_handler(DRM_IRQ_ARGS)
 		cur_irq++;
 	}
 
-	/* Acknowlege interrupts */
+	/* Acknowledge interrupts */
 	VIA_WRITE(VIA_REG_INTERRUPT, status);
 
 
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static __inline__ void viadrv_acknowledge_irqs(drm_via_private_t * dev_priv)
 	u32 status;
 
 	if (dev_priv) {
-		/* Acknowlege interrupts */
+		/* Acknowledge interrupts */
 		status = VIA_READ(VIA_REG_INTERRUPT);
 		VIA_WRITE(VIA_REG_INTERRUPT, status |
 			  dev_priv->irq_pending_mask);