diff options
author | Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com> | 2013-07-27 10:17:12 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> | 2013-07-30 13:04:52 +1000 |
commit | 35095f7529bb6abdfc956e7a41ca6957520b70a7 (patch) | |
tree | 8bbcde7796a2743c6b7d56323afbebec89920f25 /drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau | |
parent | 9a7046d55f319b2dde5d2536cc2adb01ebdbe09e (diff) | |
download | op-kernel-dev-35095f7529bb6abdfc956e7a41ca6957520b70a7.zip op-kernel-dev-35095f7529bb6abdfc956e7a41ca6957520b70a7.tar.gz |
drm/nouveau: fix size check for cards without vm
Op 24-07-13 17:55, Dan Carpenter schreef:
> Hello Maarten Lankhorst,
>
> This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
>
> The patch 0108bc808107: "drm/nouveau: do not allow negative sizes for
> now" from Jul 7, 2013, leads to the following Smatch complaint:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c:222 nouveau_bo_new()
> warn: variable dereferenced before check 'drm->client.base.vm' (see line 201)
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> 200 int type = ttm_bo_type_device;
> 201 int max_size = INT_MAX & ~((1 << drm->client.base.vm->vmm->lpg_shift) - 1);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> New dereference.
>
> 202
> 203 if (size <= 0 || size > max_size) {
> 204 nv_warn(drm, "skipped size %x\n", (u32)size);
> 205 return -EINVAL;
> 206 }
> 207
> 208 if (sg)
> 209 type = ttm_bo_type_sg;
> 210
> 211 nvbo = kzalloc(sizeof(struct nouveau_bo), GFP_KERNEL);
> 212 if (!nvbo)
> 213 return -ENOMEM;
> 214 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nvbo->head);
> 215 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nvbo->entry);
> 216 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nvbo->vma_list);
> 217 nvbo->tile_mode = tile_mode;
> 218 nvbo->tile_flags = tile_flags;
> 219 nvbo->bo.bdev = &drm->ttm.bdev;
> 220
> 221 nvbo->page_shift = 12;
> 222 if (drm->client.base.vm) {
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Old check.
>
> 223 if (!(flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_TT) && size > 256 * 1024)
> 224 nvbo->page_shift = drm->client.base.vm->vmm->lpg_shift;
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
8<-----
Commit 0108bc808107: "drm/nouveau: do not allow negative sizes for now" broke
older nvidia gpu's that lack a vm. Add an explicit check to handle this.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reported-by: konrad wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c index 4e7ee5f..af20fba 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c @@ -198,7 +198,12 @@ nouveau_bo_new(struct drm_device *dev, int size, int align, size_t acc_size; int ret; int type = ttm_bo_type_device; - int max_size = INT_MAX & ~((1 << drm->client.base.vm->vmm->lpg_shift) - 1); + int lpg_shift = 12; + int max_size; + + if (drm->client.base.vm) + lpg_shift = drm->client.base.vm->vmm->lpg_shift; + max_size = INT_MAX & ~((1 << lpg_shift) - 1); if (size <= 0 || size > max_size) { nv_warn(drm, "skipped size %x\n", (u32)size); |