drm/i915: Rename and comment all the RPS *stuff*

The names of the struct members for RPS are stupid. Every time I need to
do anything in this code I have to spend a significant amount of time to
remember what it all means. By renaming the variables (and adding the
comments) I hope to clear up the situation. Indeed doing this make some
upcoming patches more readable.

I've avoided ILK because it's possible that the naming used for Ironlake
matches what is in the docs. I believe the ILK power docs were never
published, and I am too lazy to dig them up.

v2: leave rp0, and rp1 in the names. It is useful to have these limits
available at times. min_freq and max_freq (which may be equal to rp0, or
rp1 depending on the platform) represent the actual HW min and max.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

1 files changed, 16 insertions, 16 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
index e9ffefb..e3fa8cd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static ssize_t gt_cur_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev,
 		freq = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_GPU_FREQ_STS);
 		ret = vlv_gpu_freq(dev_priv, (freq >> 8) & 0xff);
 	} else {
-		ret = dev_priv->rps.cur_delay * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
+		ret = dev_priv->rps.cur_freq * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
 
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static ssize_t vlv_rpe_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev,
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 
 	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n",
-			vlv_gpu_freq(dev_priv, dev_priv->rps.rpe_delay));
+			vlv_gpu_freq(dev_priv, dev_priv->rps.efficient_freq));
 }
 
 static ssize_t gt_max_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
@@ -298,9 +298,9 @@ static ssize_t gt_max_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
 	if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv->dev))
-		ret = vlv_gpu_freq(dev_priv, dev_priv->rps.max_delay);
+		ret = vlv_gpu_freq(dev_priv, dev_priv->rps.max_freq_softlimit);
 	else
-		ret = dev_priv->rps.max_delay * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
+		ret = dev_priv->rps.max_freq_softlimit * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
 
 	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", ret);
@@ -334,13 +334,13 @@ static ssize_t gt_max_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
 		val /= GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
 
 		rp_state_cap = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP);
-		hw_max = dev_priv->rps.hw_max;
+		hw_max = dev_priv->rps.max_freq;
 		non_oc_max = (rp_state_cap & 0xff);
 		hw_min = ((rp_state_cap & 0xff0000) >> 16);
 	}
 
 	if (val < hw_min || val > hw_max ||
-	    val < dev_priv->rps.min_delay) {
+	    val < dev_priv->rps.min_freq_softlimit) {
 		mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -349,9 +349,9 @@ static ssize_t gt_max_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
 		DRM_DEBUG("User requested overclocking to %d\n",
 			  val * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER);
 
-	dev_priv->rps.max_delay = val;
+	dev_priv->rps.max_freq_softlimit = val;
 
-	if (dev_priv->rps.cur_delay > val) {
+	if (dev_priv->rps.cur_freq > val) {
 		if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
 			valleyview_set_rps(dev, val);
 		else
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static ssize_t gt_max_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
 		/* We still need gen6_set_rps to process the new max_delay and
 		 * update the interrupt limits even though frequency request is
 		 * unchanged. */
-		gen6_set_rps(dev, dev_priv->rps.cur_delay);
+		gen6_set_rps(dev, dev_priv->rps.cur_freq);
 	}
 
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
@@ -379,9 +379,9 @@ static ssize_t gt_min_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
 	if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv->dev))
-		ret = vlv_gpu_freq(dev_priv, dev_priv->rps.min_delay);
+		ret = vlv_gpu_freq(dev_priv, dev_priv->rps.min_freq_softlimit);
 	else
-		ret = dev_priv->rps.min_delay * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
+		ret = dev_priv->rps.min_freq_softlimit * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
 
 	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", ret);
@@ -414,18 +414,18 @@ static ssize_t gt_min_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
 		val /= GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
 
 		rp_state_cap = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP);
-		hw_max = dev_priv->rps.hw_max;
+		hw_max = dev_priv->rps.max_freq;
 		hw_min = ((rp_state_cap & 0xff0000) >> 16);
 	}
 
-	if (val < hw_min || val > hw_max || val > dev_priv->rps.max_delay) {
+	if (val < hw_min || val > hw_max || val > dev_priv->rps.max_freq_softlimit) {
 		mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	dev_priv->rps.min_delay = val;
+	dev_priv->rps.min_freq_softlimit = val;
 
-	if (dev_priv->rps.cur_delay < val) {
+	if (dev_priv->rps.cur_freq < val) {
 		if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
 			valleyview_set_rps(dev, val);
 		else
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ static ssize_t gt_min_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
 		/* We still need gen6_set_rps to process the new min_delay and
 		 * update the interrupt limits even though frequency request is
 		 * unchanged. */
-		gen6_set_rps(dev, dev_priv->rps.cur_delay);
+		gen6_set_rps(dev, dev_priv->rps.cur_freq);
 	}
 
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);