drm/i915: Don't accumulate hangcheck score on forward progress

If the actual head has progressed forward inside a batch (request),
don't accumulate hangcheck score.

As the hangcheck score in increased only by acthd jumping backwards,
the result is that we only declare an active batch as stuck if it is
trapped inside a loop. Or that the looping will dominate the batch
progression so that it overcomes the bonus that forward progress gives.

v2: Improved commit message (Chris Wilson)

Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
[danvet: s/active_loop/active (loop)/ as requested by Chris.]
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 6ef9d6f..390ccc2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -3189,8 +3189,14 @@ ring_stuck(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, u64 acthd)
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 	u32 tmp;
 
-	if (ring->hangcheck.acthd != acthd)
-		return HANGCHECK_ACTIVE;
+	if (acthd != ring->hangcheck.acthd) {
+		if (acthd > ring->hangcheck.max_acthd) {
+			ring->hangcheck.max_acthd = acthd;
+			return HANGCHECK_ACTIVE;
+		}
+
+		return HANGCHECK_ACTIVE_LOOP;
+	}
 
 	if (IS_GEN2(dev))
 		return HANGCHECK_HUNG;
@@ -3301,8 +3307,9 @@ static void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(unsigned long data)
 				switch (ring->hangcheck.action) {
 				case HANGCHECK_IDLE:
 				case HANGCHECK_WAIT:
-					break;
 				case HANGCHECK_ACTIVE:
+					break;
+				case HANGCHECK_ACTIVE_LOOP:
 					ring->hangcheck.score += BUSY;
 					break;
 				case HANGCHECK_KICK:
@@ -3322,6 +3329,8 @@ static void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(unsigned long data)
 			 */
 			if (ring->hangcheck.score > 0)
 				ring->hangcheck.score--;
+
+			ring->hangcheck.acthd = ring->hangcheck.max_acthd = 0;
 		}
 
 		ring->hangcheck.seqno = seqno;