gpio: mcp23s08: rename the device tree property

The device tree property should be more descriptive.
microchip seems more reasonable than mcp. The old mcp
prefix is still supported but marked as deprecated.
Users of mcp have to switch to the microchip prefix.

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@lemonage.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 34 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c
index d96bf8a..2deb0c5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c
@@ -483,10 +483,21 @@ fail:
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPI_MASTER
 static struct of_device_id mcp23s08_spi_of_match[] = {
 	{
-		.compatible = "mcp,mcp23s08", .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S08,
+		.compatible = "microchip,mcp23s08",
+		.data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S08,
 	},
 	{
-		.compatible = "mcp,mcp23s17", .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S17,
+		.compatible = "microchip,mcp23s17",
+		.data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S17,
+	},
+/* NOTE: The use of the mcp prefix is deprecated and will be removed. */
+	{
+		.compatible = "mcp,mcp23s08",
+		.data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S08,
+	},
+	{
+		.compatible = "mcp,mcp23s17",
+		.data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S17,
 	},
 	{ },
 };
@@ -496,10 +507,21 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mcp23s08_spi_of_match);
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C)
 static struct of_device_id mcp23s08_i2c_of_match[] = {
 	{
-		.compatible = "mcp,mcp23008", .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_008,
+		.compatible = "microchip,mcp23008",
+		.data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_008,
+	},
+	{
+		.compatible = "microchip,mcp23017",
+		.data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_017,
 	},
+/* NOTE: The use of the mcp prefix is deprecated and will be removed. */
 	{
-		.compatible = "mcp,mcp23017", .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_017,
+		.compatible = "mcp,mcp23008",
+		.data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_008,
+	},
+	{
+		.compatible = "mcp,mcp23017",
+		.data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_017,
 	},
 	{ },
 };
@@ -620,10 +642,15 @@ static int mcp23s08_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
 	if (match) {
 		type = (int)match->data;
 		status = of_property_read_u32(spi->dev.of_node,
-				"mcp,spi-present-mask", &spi_present_mask);
+			    "microchip,spi-present-mask", &spi_present_mask);
 		if (status) {
-			dev_err(&spi->dev, "DT has no spi-present-mask\n");
-			return -ENODEV;
+			status = of_property_read_u32(spi->dev.of_node,
+				    "mcp,spi-present-mask", &spi_present_mask);
+			if (status) {
+				dev_err(&spi->dev,
+					"DT has no spi-present-mask\n");
+				return -ENODEV;
+			}
 		}
 		if ((spi_present_mask <= 0) || (spi_present_mask >= 256)) {
 			dev_err(&spi->dev, "invalid spi-present-mask\n");