Power Management: use mutexes instead of semaphores

The Power Management code uses semaphores as mutexes.  Use the mutex API
instead of the (binary) semaphores.

Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/suspend.c b/drivers/base/power/suspend.c
index 42d2b86..9d6701c 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/suspend.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/suspend.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ int suspend_device(struct device * dev, pm_message_t state)
 
 /*
  * This is called with interrupts off, only a single CPU
- * running. We can't do down() on a semaphore (and we don't
+ * running. We can't acquire a mutex or semaphore (and we don't
  * need the protection)
  */
 static int suspend_device_late(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state)
@@ -153,18 +153,18 @@ int device_suspend(pm_message_t state)
 	int error = 0;
 
 	might_sleep();
-	down(&dpm_sem);
-	down(&dpm_list_sem);
+	mutex_lock(&dpm_mtx);
+	mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
 	while (!list_empty(&dpm_active) && error == 0) {
 		struct list_head * entry = dpm_active.prev;
 		struct device * dev = to_device(entry);
 
 		get_device(dev);
-		up(&dpm_list_sem);
+		mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
 
 		error = suspend_device(dev, state);
 
-		down(&dpm_list_sem);
+		mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
 
 		/* Check if the device got removed */
 		if (!list_empty(&dev->power.entry)) {
@@ -179,11 +179,11 @@ int device_suspend(pm_message_t state)
 				error == -EAGAIN ? " (please convert to suspend_late)" : "");
 		put_device(dev);
 	}
-	up(&dpm_list_sem);
+	mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
 	if (error)
 		dpm_resume();
 
-	up(&dpm_sem);
+	mutex_unlock(&dpm_mtx);
 	return error;
 }