libata: rename SFF functions

SFF functions have confusing names.  Some have sff prefix, some have
bmdma, some std, some pci and some none.  Unify the naming by...

* SFF functions which are common to both BMDMA and non-BMDMA are
  prefixed with ata_sff_.

* SFF functions which are specific to BMDMA are prefixed with
  ata_bmdma_.

* SFF functions which are specific to PCI but apply to both BMDMA and
  non-BMDMA are prefixed with ata_pci_sff_.

* SFF functions which are specific to PCI and BMDMA are prefixed with
  ata_pci_bmdma_.

* Drop generic prefixes from LLD specific routines.  For example,
  bfin_std_dev_select -> bfin_dev_select.

The following renames are noteworthy.

  ata_qc_issue_prot() -> ata_sff_qc_issue()
  ata_pci_default_filter() -> ata_bmdma_mode_filter()
  ata_dev_try_classify() -> ata_sff_dev_classify()

This rename is in preparation of separating SFF support out of libata
core layer.  This patch strictly renames functions and doesn't
introduce any behavior difference.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_netcell.c b/drivers/ata/pata_netcell.c
index 3491828..d9719c8 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_netcell.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_netcell.c
@@ -68,10 +68,10 @@ static int netcell_init_one (struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *e
 		return rc;
 
 	/* Any chip specific setup/optimisation/messages here */
-	ata_pci_clear_simplex(pdev);
+	ata_pci_bmdma_clear_simplex(pdev);
 
 	/* And let the library code do the work */
-	return ata_pci_init_one(pdev, port_info, &netcell_sht, NULL);
+	return ata_pci_sff_init_one(pdev, port_info, &netcell_sht, NULL);
 }
 
 static const struct pci_device_id netcell_pci_tbl[] = {