blk-mq: avoid inserting requests before establishing new mapping

Notifier callbacks for CPU_ONLINE action can be run on the other CPU
than the CPU which was just onlined.  So it is possible for the
process running on the just onlined CPU to insert request and run
hw queue before establishing new mapping which is done by
blk_mq_queue_reinit_notify().

This can cause a problem when the CPU has just been onlined first time
since the request queue was initialized.  At this time ctx->index_hw
for the CPU, which is the index in hctx->ctxs[] for this ctx, is still
zero before blk_mq_queue_reinit_notify() is called by notifier
callbacks for CPU_ONLINE action.

For example, there is a single hw queue (hctx) and two CPU queues
(ctx0 for CPU0, and ctx1 for CPU1).  Now CPU1 is just onlined and
a request is inserted into ctx1->rq_list and set bit0 in pending
bitmap as ctx1->index_hw is still zero.

And then while running hw queue, flush_busy_ctxs() finds bit0 is set
in pending bitmap and tries to retrieve requests in
hctx->ctxs[0]->rq_list.  But htx->ctxs[0] is a pointer to ctx0, so the
request in ctx1->rq_list is ignored.

Fix it by ensuring that new mapping is established before onlined cpu
starts running.

Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

1 files changed, 45 insertions, 14 deletions

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 3a39184..a5dbd06 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1789,7 +1789,8 @@ static void blk_mq_init_cpu_queues(struct request_queue *q,
 	}
 }
 
-static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct request_queue *q)
+static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct request_queue *q,
+			       const struct cpumask *online_mask)
 {
 	unsigned int i;
 	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
@@ -1806,7 +1807,7 @@ static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct request_queue *q)
 	 */
 	queue_for_each_ctx(q, ctx, i) {
 		/* If the cpu isn't online, the cpu is mapped to first hctx */
-		if (!cpu_online(i))
+		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(i, online_mask))
 			continue;
 
 		hctx = q->mq_ops->map_queue(q, i);
@@ -1852,7 +1853,7 @@ static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct request_queue *q)
 	}
 
 	queue_for_each_ctx(q, ctx, i) {
-		if (!cpu_online(i))
+		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(i, online_mask))
 			continue;
 
 		hctx = q->mq_ops->map_queue(q, i);
@@ -2037,13 +2038,15 @@ struct request_queue *blk_mq_init_allocated_queue(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
 	if (blk_mq_init_hw_queues(q, set))
 		goto err_hctxs;
 
+	get_online_cpus();
 	mutex_lock(&all_q_mutex);
 
 	list_add_tail(&q->all_q_node, &all_q_list);
 	blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set(set, q);
-	blk_mq_map_swqueue(q);
+	blk_mq_map_swqueue(q, cpu_online_mask);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&all_q_mutex);
+	put_online_cpus();
 
 	return q;
 
@@ -2080,13 +2083,14 @@ void blk_mq_free_queue(struct request_queue *q)
 }
 
 /* Basically redo blk_mq_init_queue with queue frozen */
-static void blk_mq_queue_reinit(struct request_queue *q)
+static void blk_mq_queue_reinit(struct request_queue *q,
+				const struct cpumask *online_mask)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!atomic_read(&q->mq_freeze_depth));
 
 	blk_mq_sysfs_unregister(q);
 
-	blk_mq_update_queue_map(q->mq_map, q->nr_hw_queues);
+	blk_mq_update_queue_map(q->mq_map, q->nr_hw_queues, online_mask);
 
 	/*
 	 * redo blk_mq_init_cpu_queues and blk_mq_init_hw_queues. FIXME: maybe
@@ -2094,7 +2098,7 @@ static void blk_mq_queue_reinit(struct request_queue *q)
 	 * involves free and re-allocate memory, worthy doing?)
 	 */
 
-	blk_mq_map_swqueue(q);
+	blk_mq_map_swqueue(q, online_mask);
 
 	blk_mq_sysfs_register(q);
 }
@@ -2103,16 +2107,43 @@ static int blk_mq_queue_reinit_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
 				      unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
 {
 	struct request_queue *q;
+	int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
+	/*
+	 * New online cpumask which is going to be set in this hotplug event.
+	 * Declare this cpumasks as global as cpu-hotplug operation is invoked
+	 * one-by-one and dynamically allocating this could result in a failure.
+	 */
+	static struct cpumask online_new;
 
 	/*
-	 * Before new mappings are established, hotadded cpu might already
-	 * start handling requests. This doesn't break anything as we map
-	 * offline CPUs to first hardware queue. We will re-init the queue
-	 * below to get optimal settings.
+	 * Before hotadded cpu starts handling requests, new mappings must
+	 * be established.  Otherwise, these requests in hw queue might
+	 * never be dispatched.
+	 *
+	 * For example, there is a single hw queue (hctx) and two CPU queues
+	 * (ctx0 for CPU0, and ctx1 for CPU1).
+	 *
+	 * Now CPU1 is just onlined and a request is inserted into
+	 * ctx1->rq_list and set bit0 in pending bitmap as ctx1->index_hw is
+	 * still zero.
+	 *
+	 * And then while running hw queue, flush_busy_ctxs() finds bit0 is
+	 * set in pending bitmap and tries to retrieve requests in
+	 * hctx->ctxs[0]->rq_list.  But htx->ctxs[0] is a pointer to ctx0,
+	 * so the request in ctx1->rq_list is ignored.
 	 */
-	if (action != CPU_DEAD && action != CPU_DEAD_FROZEN &&
-	    action != CPU_ONLINE && action != CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN)
+	switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
+	case CPU_DEAD:
+	case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
+		cpumask_copy(&online_new, cpu_online_mask);
+		break;
+	case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
+		cpumask_copy(&online_new, cpu_online_mask);
+		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &online_new);
+		break;
+	default:
 		return NOTIFY_OK;
+	}
 
 	mutex_lock(&all_q_mutex);
 
@@ -2136,7 +2167,7 @@ static int blk_mq_queue_reinit_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
 	}
 
 	list_for_each_entry(q, &all_q_list, all_q_node)
-		blk_mq_queue_reinit(q);
+		blk_mq_queue_reinit(q, &online_new);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(q, &all_q_list, all_q_node)
 		blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);