blk-mq: new multi-queue block IO queueing mechanism

Linux currently has two models for block devices:

- The classic request_fn based approach, where drivers use struct
  request units for IO. The block layer provides various helper
  functionalities to let drivers share code, things like tag
  management, timeout handling, queueing, etc.

- The "stacked" approach, where a driver squeezes in between the
  block layer and IO submitter. Since this bypasses the IO stack,
  driver generally have to manage everything themselves.

With drivers being written for new high IOPS devices, the classic
request_fn based driver doesn't work well enough. The design dates
back to when both SMP and high IOPS was rare. It has problems with
scaling to bigger machines, and runs into scaling issues even on
smaller machines when you have IOPS in the hundreds of thousands
per device.

The stacked approach is then most often selected as the model
for the driver. But this means that everybody has to re-invent
everything, and along with that we get all the problems again
that the shared approach solved.

This commit introduces blk-mq, block multi queue support. The
design is centered around per-cpu queues for queueing IO, which
then funnel down into x number of hardware submission queues.
We might have a 1:1 mapping between the two, or it might be
an N:M mapping. That all depends on what the hardware supports.

blk-mq provides various helper functions, which include:

- Scalable support for request tagging. Most devices need to
  be able to uniquely identify a request both in the driver and
  to the hardware. The tagging uses per-cpu caches for freed
  tags, to enable cache hot reuse.

- Timeout handling without tracking request on a per-device
  basis. Basically the driver should be able to get a notification,
  if a request happens to fail.

- Optional support for non 1:1 mappings between issue and
  submission queues. blk-mq can redirect IO completions to the
  desired location.

- Support for per-request payloads. Drivers almost always need
  to associate a request structure with some driver private
  command structure. Drivers can tell blk-mq this at init time,
  and then any request handed to the driver will have the
  required size of memory associated with it.

- Support for merging of IO, and plugging. The stacked model
  gets neither of these. Even for high IOPS devices, merging
  sequential IO reduces per-command overhead and thus
  increases bandwidth.

For now, this is provided as a potential 3rd queueing model, with
the hope being that, as it matures, it can replace both the classic
and stacked model. That would get us back to having just 1 real
model for block devices, leaving the stacked approach to dm/md
devices (as it was originally intended).

Contributions in this patch from the following people:

Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Matias Bjorling <m@bjorling.me>
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

1 files changed, 93 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-cpu.c b/block/blk-mq-cpu.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f8ea39d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/block/blk-mq-cpu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/blkdev.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/llist.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
+
+#include <linux/blk-mq.h>
+#include "blk-mq.h"
+
+static LIST_HEAD(blk_mq_cpu_notify_list);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(blk_mq_cpu_notify_lock);
+
+static int __cpuinit blk_mq_main_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
+					    unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
+{
+	unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long) hcpu;
+	struct blk_mq_cpu_notifier *notify;
+
+	spin_lock(&blk_mq_cpu_notify_lock);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(notify, &blk_mq_cpu_notify_list, list)
+		notify->notify(notify->data, action, cpu);
+
+	spin_unlock(&blk_mq_cpu_notify_lock);
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
+}
+
+static void __cpuinit blk_mq_cpu_notify(void *data, unsigned long action,
+					unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	if (action == CPU_DEAD || action == CPU_DEAD_FROZEN) {
+		/*
+		 * If the CPU goes away, ensure that we run any pending
+		 * completions.
+		 */
+		struct llist_node *node;
+		struct request *rq;
+
+		local_irq_disable();
+
+		node = llist_del_all(&per_cpu(ipi_lists, cpu));
+		while (node) {
+			struct llist_node *next = node->next;
+
+			rq = llist_entry(node, struct request, ll_list);
+			__blk_mq_end_io(rq, rq->errors);
+			node = next;
+		}
+
+		local_irq_enable();
+	}
+}
+
+static struct notifier_block __cpuinitdata blk_mq_main_cpu_notifier = {
+	.notifier_call	= blk_mq_main_cpu_notify,
+};
+
+void blk_mq_register_cpu_notifier(struct blk_mq_cpu_notifier *notifier)
+{
+	BUG_ON(!notifier->notify);
+
+	spin_lock(&blk_mq_cpu_notify_lock);
+	list_add_tail(&notifier->list, &blk_mq_cpu_notify_list);
+	spin_unlock(&blk_mq_cpu_notify_lock);
+}
+
+void blk_mq_unregister_cpu_notifier(struct blk_mq_cpu_notifier *notifier)
+{
+	spin_lock(&blk_mq_cpu_notify_lock);
+	list_del(&notifier->list);
+	spin_unlock(&blk_mq_cpu_notify_lock);
+}
+
+void blk_mq_init_cpu_notifier(struct blk_mq_cpu_notifier *notifier,
+			      void (*fn)(void *, unsigned long, unsigned int),
+			      void *data)
+{
+	notifier->notify = fn;
+	notifier->data = data;
+}
+
+static struct blk_mq_cpu_notifier __cpuinitdata cpu_notifier = {
+	.notify = blk_mq_cpu_notify,
+};
+
+void __init blk_mq_cpu_init(void)
+{
+	register_hotcpu_notifier(&blk_mq_main_cpu_notifier);
+	blk_mq_register_cpu_notifier(&cpu_notifier);
+}