x86: clean up comments wrt. rd{msr|tsc|pmc}

The rdmsr instruction(et al) for i386 and x86-64 are semantically same.
The only difference is how gcc interpret constraint "A" for these targets.

Signed-off-by: Jike Song <albcamus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index 46be2fa..478a924 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
@@ -22,10 +22,10 @@ static inline unsigned long long native_read_tscp(unsigned int *aux)
 }
 
 /*
- * i386 calling convention returns 64-bit value in edx:eax, while
- * x86_64 returns at rax. Also, the "A" constraint does not really
- * mean rdx:rax in x86_64, so we need specialized behaviour for each
- * architecture
+ * both i386 and x86_64 returns 64-bit value in edx:eax, but gcc's "A"
+ * constraint has different meanings. For i386, "A" means exactly
+ * edx:eax, while for x86_64 it doesn't mean rdx:rax or edx:eax. Instead,
+ * it means rax *or* rdx.
  */
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 #define DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high)	unsigned low, high