diff options
| author | Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> | 2011-12-18 01:05:31 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2011-12-18 09:14:31 +0100 |
| commit | 1affc46cffad9f2bc7c9ffec85726446903a58f9 (patch) | |
| tree | 9575e5bb55445b034db36202c40fbec7f0ea4611 /arch/x86 | |
| parent | 2ac13462b6d242684996e88a07fbed6dec6af622 (diff) | |
| download | op-kernel-dev-1affc46cffad9f2bc7c9ffec85726446903a58f9.zip op-kernel-dev-1affc46cffad9f2bc7c9ffec85726446903a58f9.tar.gz | |
x86: Use "do { } while(0)" for empty lock_cmos()/unlock_cmos() macros
gcc noticed (when using -Wempty-body) that our use of
lock_cmos() and unlock_cmos() in
arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h is potentially problematic :
arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h:32:15: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ¡else¢ statement [-Wempty-body]
arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h:40:16: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ¡else¢ statement [-Wempty-body]
Let's just use the standard 'do {} while (0)' solution. That
shuts up gcc and also prevents future problems if the macros
should end up being used in a similar situation elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LNX.2.00.1112180103130.21784@swampdragon.chaosbits.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h index 01fdf56..0e8e85b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h @@ -81,8 +81,8 @@ static inline unsigned char current_lock_cmos_reg(void) #else #define lock_cmos_prefix(reg) do {} while (0) #define lock_cmos_suffix(reg) do {} while (0) -#define lock_cmos(reg) -#define unlock_cmos() +#define lock_cmos(reg) do { } while (0) +#define unlock_cmos() do { } while (0) #define do_i_have_lock_cmos() 0 #define current_lock_cmos_reg() 0 #endif |
