x86/fpu/xstate: Fix supervisor xstate component offset

CPUID function 0x0d, sub function (i, i > 1) returns in ebx the offset of
xstate component i. Zero is returned for a supervisor state. A supervisor
state can only be saved by XSAVES and XSAVES uses a compacted format.
There is no fixed offset for a supervisor state. This patch checks and
makes sure a supervisor state offset is not recorded or mis-used. This has
no effect in practice as we currently use no supervisor states, but it
would be good to fix.

Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com>
Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/81b29e40d35d4cec9f2511a856fe769f34935a3f.1466179491.git.yu-cheng.yu@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 39 insertions, 23 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
index 7963029..02786fb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
@@ -112,6 +112,27 @@ int cpu_has_xfeatures(u64 xfeatures_needed, const char **feature_name)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_has_xfeatures);
 
+static int xfeature_is_supervisor(int xfeature_nr)
+{
+	/*
+	 * We currently do not support supervisor states, but if
+	 * we did, we could find out like this.
+	 *
+	 * SDM says: If state component 'i' is a user state component,
+	 * ECX[0] return 0; if state component i is a supervisor
+	 * state component, ECX[0] returns 1.
+	 */
+	u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
+
+	cpuid_count(XSTATE_CPUID, xfeature_nr, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+	return !!(ecx & 1);
+}
+
+static int xfeature_is_user(int xfeature_nr)
+{
+	return !xfeature_is_supervisor(xfeature_nr);
+}
+
 /*
  * When executing XSAVEOPT (or other optimized XSAVE instructions), if
  * a processor implementation detects that an FPU state component is still
@@ -230,7 +251,14 @@ static void __init setup_xstate_features(void)
 			continue;
 
 		cpuid_count(XSTATE_CPUID, i, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
-		xstate_offsets[i] = ebx;
+
+		/*
+		 * If an xfeature is supervisor state, the offset
+		 * in EBX is invalid. We leave it to -1.
+		 */
+		if (xfeature_is_user(i))
+			xstate_offsets[i] = ebx;
+
 		xstate_sizes[i] = eax;
 		/*
 		 * In our xstate size checks, we assume that the
@@ -375,32 +403,20 @@ static void __init setup_init_fpu_buf(void)
 	copy_xregs_to_kernel_booting(&init_fpstate.xsave);
 }
 
-static int xfeature_is_supervisor(int xfeature_nr)
-{
-	/*
-	 * We currently do not support supervisor states, but if
-	 * we did, we could find out like this.
-	 *
-	 * SDM says: If state component i is a user state component,
-	 * ECX[0] return 0; if state component i is a supervisor
-	 * state component, ECX[0] returns 1.
-	u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
-	cpuid_count(XSTATE_CPUID, xfeature_nr, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx;
-	return !!(ecx & 1);
-	*/
-	return 0;
-}
-/*
-static int xfeature_is_user(int xfeature_nr)
-{
-	return !xfeature_is_supervisor(xfeature_nr);
-}
-*/
-
 static int xfeature_uncompacted_offset(int xfeature_nr)
 {
 	u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
 
+	/*
+	 * Only XSAVES supports supervisor states and it uses compacted
+	 * format. Checking a supervisor state's uncompacted offset is
+	 * an error.
+	 */
+	if (XFEATURE_MASK_SUPERVISOR & (1 << xfeature_nr)) {
+		WARN_ONCE(1, "No fixed offset for xstate %d\n", xfeature_nr);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	CHECK_XFEATURE(xfeature_nr);
 	cpuid_count(XSTATE_CPUID, xfeature_nr, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
 	return ebx;