x86: Use memblock to replace early_res

1. replace find_e820_area with memblock_find_in_range
2. replace reserve_early with memblock_x86_reserve_range
3. replace free_early with memblock_x86_free_range.
4. NO_BOOTMEM will switch to use memblock too.
5. use _e820, _early wrap in the patch, in following patch, will
   replace them all
6. because memblock_x86_free_range support partial free, we can remove some special care
7. Need to make sure that memblock_find_in_range() is called after memblock_x86_fill()
   so adjust some calling later in setup.c::setup_arch()
   -- corruption_check and mptable_update

-v2: Move reserve_brk() early
    Before fill_memblock_area, to avoid overlap between brk and memblock_find_in_range()
    that could happen We have more then 128 RAM entry in E820 tables, and
    memblock_x86_fill() could use memblock_find_in_range() to find a new place for
    memblock.memory.region array.
    and We don't need to use extend_brk() after fill_memblock_area()
    So move reserve_brk() early before fill_memblock_area().
-v3: Move find_smp_config early
    To make sure memblock_find_in_range not find wrong place, if BIOS doesn't put mptable
    in right place.
-v4: Treat RESERVED_KERN as RAM in memblock.memory. and they are already in
    memblock.reserved already..
    use __NOT_KEEP_MEMBLOCK to make sure memblock related code could be freed later.
-v5: Generic version __memblock_find_in_range() is going from high to low, and for 32bit
    active_region for 32bit does include high pages
    need to replace the limit with memblock.default_alloc_limit, aka get_max_mapped()
-v6: Use current_limit instead
-v7: check with MEMBLOCK_ERROR instead of -1ULL or -1L
-v8: Set memblock_can_resize early to handle EFI with more RAM entries
-v9: update after kmemleak changes in mainline

Suggested-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Suggested-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/check.c b/arch/x86/kernel/check.c
index fc999e6..13a3891 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/check.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/check.c
@@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
-#include <asm/e820.h>
+#include <linux/memblock.h>
+
 #include <asm/proto.h>
 
 /*
@@ -18,10 +19,12 @@ static int __read_mostly memory_corruption_check = -1;
 static unsigned __read_mostly corruption_check_size = 64*1024;
 static unsigned __read_mostly corruption_check_period = 60; /* seconds */
 
-static struct e820entry scan_areas[MAX_SCAN_AREAS];
+static struct scan_area {
+	u64 addr;
+	u64 size;
+} scan_areas[MAX_SCAN_AREAS];
 static int num_scan_areas;
 
-
 static __init int set_corruption_check(char *arg)
 {
 	char *end;
@@ -81,9 +84,9 @@ void __init setup_bios_corruption_check(void)
 
 	while (addr < corruption_check_size && num_scan_areas < MAX_SCAN_AREAS) {
 		u64 size;
-		addr = find_e820_area_size(addr, &size, PAGE_SIZE);
+		addr = memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(addr, &size, PAGE_SIZE);
 
-		if (!(addr + 1))
+		if (addr == MEMBLOCK_ERROR)
 			break;
 
 		if (addr >= corruption_check_size)
@@ -92,7 +95,7 @@ void __init setup_bios_corruption_check(void)
 		if ((addr + size) > corruption_check_size)
 			size = corruption_check_size - addr;
 
-		e820_update_range(addr, size, E820_RAM, E820_RESERVED);
+		memblock_x86_reserve_range(addr, addr + size, "SCAN RAM");
 		scan_areas[num_scan_areas].addr = addr;
 		scan_areas[num_scan_areas].size = size;
 		num_scan_areas++;
@@ -105,7 +108,6 @@ void __init setup_bios_corruption_check(void)
 
 	printk(KERN_INFO "Scanning %d areas for low memory corruption\n",
 	       num_scan_areas);
-	update_e820();
 }