Merge commit 'v2.6.32-rc7'

Resolve the conflict between v2.6.32-rc7 where dn_def_dev_handler
gets a small bug fix and the sysctl tree where I am removing all
sysctl strategy routines.

3 files changed, 7 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/system_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/system_64.h
index 25e848f..d47a98e 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/system_64.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/system_64.h
@@ -63,6 +63,10 @@ do {	__asm__ __volatile__("ba,pt	%%xcc, 1f\n\t" \
 			     : : : "memory"); \
 } while (0)
 
+/* The kernel always executes in TSO memory model these days,
+ * and furthermore most sparc64 chips implement more stringent
+ * memory ordering than required by the specifications.
+ */
 #define mb()	membar_safe("#StoreLoad")
 #define rmb()	__asm__ __volatile__("":::"memory")
 #define wmb()	__asm__ __volatile__("":::"memory")
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_common.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_common.c
index 138910c..d80a65d 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_common.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_common.c
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ int of_set_property(struct device_node *dp, const char *name, void *val, int len
 
 	err = -ENODEV;
 
+	mutex_lock(&of_set_property_mutex);
 	write_lock(&devtree_lock);
 	prevp = &dp->properties;
 	while (*prevp) {
@@ -88,9 +89,7 @@ int of_set_property(struct device_node *dp, const char *name, void *val, int len
 			void *old_val = prop->value;
 			int ret;
 
-			mutex_lock(&of_set_property_mutex);
 			ret = prom_setprop(dp->node, name, val, len);
-			mutex_unlock(&of_set_property_mutex);
 
 			err = -EINVAL;
 			if (ret >= 0) {
@@ -109,6 +108,7 @@ int of_set_property(struct device_node *dp, const char *name, void *val, int len
 		prevp = &(*prevp)->next;
 	}
 	write_unlock(&devtree_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&of_set_property_mutex);
 
 	/* XXX Upate procfs if necessary... */
 
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/visemul.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/visemul.c
index b956fd7..d231cbd 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/visemul.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/visemul.c
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static void pmul(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int insn, unsigned int opf)
 		rs2 = fps_regval(f, RS2(insn));
 
 		rd_val = 0;
-		src2 = (rs2 >> (opf == FMUL8x16AU_OPF) ? 16 : 0);
+		src2 = rs2 >> (opf == FMUL8x16AU_OPF ? 16 : 0);
 		for (byte = 0; byte < 4; byte++) {
 			u16 src1 = (rs1 >> (byte * 8)) & 0x00ff;
 			u32 prod = src1 * src2;