sparc64: Fix illegal relative branches in hypervisor patched TLB code.

When we copy code over to patch another piece of code, we can only use
PC-relative branches that target code within that piece of code.

Such PC-relative branches cannot be made to external symbols because
the patch moves the location of the code and thus modifies the
relative address of external symbols.

Use an absolute jmpl to fix this problem.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 51 insertions, 14 deletions

diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/ultra.S b/arch/sparc/mm/ultra.S
index b4f4733..85de139 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/mm/ultra.S
+++ b/arch/sparc/mm/ultra.S
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
 	.text
 	.align		32
 	.globl		__flush_tlb_mm
-__flush_tlb_mm:		/* 18 insns */
+__flush_tlb_mm:		/* 19 insns */
 	/* %o0=(ctx & TAG_CONTEXT_BITS), %o1=SECONDARY_CONTEXT */
 	ldxa		[%o1] ASI_DMMU, %g2
 	cmp		%g2, %o0
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ __flush_tlb_page:	/* 22 insns */
 
 	.align		32
 	.globl		__flush_tlb_pending
-__flush_tlb_pending:	/* 26 insns */
+__flush_tlb_pending:	/* 27 insns */
 	/* %o0 = context, %o1 = nr, %o2 = vaddrs[] */
 	rdpr		%pstate, %g7
 	sllx		%o1, 3, %o1
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ __flush_tlb_pending:	/* 26 insns */
 
 	.align		32
 	.globl		__flush_tlb_kernel_range
-__flush_tlb_kernel_range:	/* 16 insns */
+__flush_tlb_kernel_range:	/* 19 insns */
 	/* %o0=start, %o1=end */
 	cmp		%o0, %o1
 	be,pn		%xcc, 2f
@@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ __flush_tlb_kernel_range:	/* 16 insns */
 	retl
 	 nop
 	nop
+	nop
+	nop
+	nop
 
 __spitfire_flush_tlb_mm_slow:
 	rdpr		%pstate, %g1
@@ -309,19 +312,28 @@ __hypervisor_tlb_tl0_error:
 	ret
 	 restore
 
-__hypervisor_flush_tlb_mm: /* 10 insns */
+__hypervisor_flush_tlb_mm: /* 19 insns */
 	mov		%o0, %o2	/* ARG2: mmu context */
 	mov		0, %o0		/* ARG0: CPU lists unimplemented */
 	mov		0, %o1		/* ARG1: CPU lists unimplemented */
 	mov		HV_MMU_ALL, %o3	/* ARG3: flags */
 	mov		HV_FAST_MMU_DEMAP_CTX, %o5
 	ta		HV_FAST_TRAP
-	brnz,pn		%o0, __hypervisor_tlb_tl0_error
+	brnz,pn		%o0, 1f
 	 mov		HV_FAST_MMU_DEMAP_CTX, %o1
 	retl
 	 nop
+1:	sethi		%hi(__hypervisor_tlb_tl0_error), %o5
+	jmpl		%o5 + %lo(__hypervisor_tlb_tl0_error), %g0
+	 nop
+	nop
+	nop
+	nop
+	nop
+	nop
+	nop
 
-__hypervisor_flush_tlb_page: /* 11 insns */
+__hypervisor_flush_tlb_page: /* 22 insns */
 	/* %o0 = context, %o1 = vaddr */
 	mov		%o0, %g2
 	mov		%o1, %o0              /* ARG0: vaddr + IMMU-bit */
@@ -330,10 +342,21 @@ __hypervisor_flush_tlb_page: /* 11 insns */
 	srlx		%o0, PAGE_SHIFT, %o0
 	sllx		%o0, PAGE_SHIFT, %o0
 	ta		HV_MMU_UNMAP_ADDR_TRAP
-	brnz,pn		%o0, __hypervisor_tlb_tl0_error
+	brnz,pn		%o0, 1f
 	 mov		HV_MMU_UNMAP_ADDR_TRAP, %o1
 	retl
 	 nop
+1:	sethi		%hi(__hypervisor_tlb_tl0_error), %o2
+	jmpl		%o2 + %lo(__hypervisor_tlb_tl0_error), %g0
+	 nop
+	nop
+	nop
+	nop
+	nop
+	nop
+	nop
+	nop
+	nop
 
 __hypervisor_flush_tlb_pending: /* 16 insns */
 	/* %o0 = context, %o1 = nr, %o2 = vaddrs[] */
@@ -347,14 +370,25 @@ __hypervisor_flush_tlb_pending: /* 16 insns */
 	srlx		%o0, PAGE_SHIFT, %o0
 	sllx		%o0, PAGE_SHIFT, %o0
 	ta		HV_MMU_UNMAP_ADDR_TRAP
-	brnz,pn		%o0, __hypervisor_tlb_tl0_error
+	brnz,pn		%o0, 1f
 	 mov		HV_MMU_UNMAP_ADDR_TRAP, %o1
 	brnz,pt		%g1, 1b
 	 nop
 	retl
 	 nop
+1:	sethi		%hi(__hypervisor_tlb_tl0_error), %o2
+	jmpl		%o2 + %lo(__hypervisor_tlb_tl0_error), %g0
+	 nop
+	nop
+	nop
+	nop
+	nop
+	nop
+	nop
+	nop
+	nop
 
-__hypervisor_flush_tlb_kernel_range: /* 16 insns */
+__hypervisor_flush_tlb_kernel_range: /* 19 insns */
 	/* %o0=start, %o1=end */
 	cmp		%o0, %o1
 	be,pn		%xcc, 2f
@@ -366,12 +400,15 @@ __hypervisor_flush_tlb_kernel_range: /* 16 insns */
 	mov		0, %o1		/* ARG1: mmu context */
 	mov		HV_MMU_ALL, %o2	/* ARG2: flags */
 	ta		HV_MMU_UNMAP_ADDR_TRAP
-	brnz,pn		%o0, __hypervisor_tlb_tl0_error
+	brnz,pn		%o0, 3f
 	 mov		HV_MMU_UNMAP_ADDR_TRAP, %o1
 	brnz,pt		%g2, 1b
 	 sub		%g2, %g3, %g2
 2:	retl
 	 nop
+3:	sethi		%hi(__hypervisor_tlb_tl0_error), %o2
+	jmpl		%o2 + %lo(__hypervisor_tlb_tl0_error), %g0
+	 nop
 
 #ifdef DCACHE_ALIASING_POSSIBLE
 	/* XXX Niagara and friends have an 8K cache, so no aliasing is
@@ -819,28 +856,28 @@ hypervisor_patch_cachetlbops:
 	sethi		%hi(__hypervisor_flush_tlb_mm), %o1
 	or		%o1, %lo(__hypervisor_flush_tlb_mm), %o1
 	call		tlb_patch_one
-	 mov		10, %o2
+	 mov		19, %o2
 
 	sethi		%hi(__flush_tlb_page), %o0
 	or		%o0, %lo(__flush_tlb_page), %o0
 	sethi		%hi(__hypervisor_flush_tlb_page), %o1
 	or		%o1, %lo(__hypervisor_flush_tlb_page), %o1
 	call		tlb_patch_one
-	 mov		11, %o2
+	 mov		22, %o2
 
 	sethi		%hi(__flush_tlb_pending), %o0
 	or		%o0, %lo(__flush_tlb_pending), %o0
 	sethi		%hi(__hypervisor_flush_tlb_pending), %o1
 	or		%o1, %lo(__hypervisor_flush_tlb_pending), %o1
 	call		tlb_patch_one
-	 mov		16, %o2
+	 mov		27, %o2
 
 	sethi		%hi(__flush_tlb_kernel_range), %o0
 	or		%o0, %lo(__flush_tlb_kernel_range), %o0
 	sethi		%hi(__hypervisor_flush_tlb_kernel_range), %o1
 	or		%o1, %lo(__hypervisor_flush_tlb_kernel_range), %o1
 	call		tlb_patch_one
-	 mov		16, %o2
+	 mov		19, %o2
 
 #ifdef DCACHE_ALIASING_POSSIBLE
 	sethi		%hi(__flush_dcache_page), %o0