ia64: vsyscall: Use seqcount instead of seqlock

The update of the vdso data happens under xtime_lock, so adding a
nested lock is pointless. Just use a seqcount to sync the readers.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/time.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/time.c
index 43920de..8e991a0 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/time.c
@@ -35,9 +35,7 @@
 
 static cycle_t itc_get_cycles(struct clocksource *cs);
 
-struct fsyscall_gtod_data_t fsyscall_gtod_data = {
-	.lock = __SEQLOCK_UNLOCKED(fsyscall_gtod_data.lock),
-};
+struct fsyscall_gtod_data_t fsyscall_gtod_data;
 
 struct itc_jitter_data_t itc_jitter_data;
 
@@ -460,9 +458,7 @@ void update_vsyscall_tz(void)
 void update_vsyscall(struct timespec *wall, struct timespec *wtm,
 			struct clocksource *c, u32 mult)
 {
-        unsigned long flags;
-
-        write_seqlock_irqsave(&fsyscall_gtod_data.lock, flags);
+	write_seqcount_begin(&fsyscall_gtod_data.seq);
 
         /* copy fsyscall clock data */
         fsyscall_gtod_data.clk_mask = c->mask;
@@ -485,6 +481,6 @@ void update_vsyscall(struct timespec *wall, struct timespec *wtm,
 		fsyscall_gtod_data.monotonic_time.tv_sec++;
 	}
 
-        write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&fsyscall_gtod_data.lock, flags);
+	write_seqcount_end(&fsyscall_gtod_data.seq);
 }