diff options
author | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> | 2016-06-02 15:27:04 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> | 2016-06-15 09:51:35 +0100 |
commit | 38b850a73034f075c4088e7511b36ebbef9dce00 (patch) | |
tree | 5986a70625d0311e268d8a9770ced94cb4e79f48 /arch/arm64 | |
parent | f7a6c1492a2cb596952260a7d5bb0d61ca815173 (diff) | |
download | op-kernel-dev-38b850a73034f075c4088e7511b36ebbef9dce00.zip op-kernel-dev-38b850a73034f075c4088e7511b36ebbef9dce00.tar.gz |
arm64: spinlock: order spin_{is_locked,unlock_wait} against local locks
spin_is_locked has grown two very different use-cases:
(1) [The sane case] API functions may require a certain lock to be held
by the caller and can therefore use spin_is_locked as part of an
assert statement in order to verify that the lock is indeed held.
For example, usage of assert_spin_locked.
(2) [The insane case] There are two locks, where a CPU takes one of the
locks and then checks whether or not the other one is held before
accessing some shared state. For example, the "optimized locking" in
ipc/sem.c.
In the latter case, the sequence looks like:
spin_lock(&sem->lock);
if (!spin_is_locked(&sma->sem_perm.lock))
/* Access shared state */
and requires that the spin_is_locked check is ordered after taking the
sem->lock. Unfortunately, since our spinlocks are implemented using a
LDAXR/STXR sequence, the read of &sma->sem_perm.lock can be speculated
before the STXR and consequently return a stale value.
Whilst this hasn't been seen to cause issues in practice, PowerPC fixed
the same issue in 51d7d5205d33 ("powerpc: Add smp_mb() to
arch_spin_is_locked()") and, although we did something similar for
spin_unlock_wait in d86b8da04dfa ("arm64: spinlock: serialise
spin_unlock_wait against concurrent lockers") that doesn't actually take
care of ordering against local acquisition of a different lock.
This patch adds an smp_mb() to the start of our arch_spin_is_locked and
arch_spin_unlock_wait routines to ensure that the lock value is always
loaded after any other locks have been taken by the current CPU.
Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm64')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h | 7 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h index fc9682b..aac64d5 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h @@ -31,6 +31,12 @@ static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock) unsigned int tmp; arch_spinlock_t lockval; + /* + * Ensure prior spin_lock operations to other locks have completed + * on this CPU before we test whether "lock" is locked. + */ + smp_mb(); + asm volatile( " sevl\n" "1: wfe\n" @@ -148,6 +154,7 @@ static inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock) static inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock) { + smp_mb(); /* See arch_spin_unlock_wait */ return !arch_spin_value_unlocked(READ_ONCE(*lock)); } |