perf: Fix sibling iteration

Mark noticed that the change to sibling_list changed some iteration
semantics; because previously we used group_list as list entry,
sibling events would always have an empty sibling_list.

But because we now use sibling_list for both list head and list entry,
siblings will report as having siblings.

Fix this with a custom for_each_sibling_event() iterator.

Fixes: 8343aae66167 ("perf/core: Remove perf_event::group_entry")
Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: vincent.weaver@maine.edu
Cc: alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com
Cc: valery.cherepennikov@intel.com
Cc: eranian@google.com
Cc: acme@redhat.com
Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davidcc@google.com
Cc: kan.liang@intel.com
Cc: Dmitry.Prohorov@intel.com
Cc: jolsa@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180315170129.GX4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0-pmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0-pmu.c
index 3a89ea4..afe5b4c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0-pmu.c
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static bool l2x0_pmu_group_is_valid(struct perf_event *event)
 	else if (!is_software_event(leader))
 		return false;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(sibling, &leader->sibling_list, sibling_list) {
+	for_each_sibling_event(sibling, leader) {
 		if (sibling->pmu == pmu)
 			num_hw++;
 		else if (!is_software_event(sibling))