diff options
author | Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com> | 2006-07-04 02:57:52 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> | 2006-07-04 10:24:57 -0700 |
commit | a46f9484f8926aacb2e79a0e1676de3a6a6fbae8 (patch) | |
tree | 21d90306af4677091547465c1ba02e0545276d1a /Makefile | |
parent | dd8041f16b117f63f40fb844d6cdebe8b03514d2 (diff) | |
download | op-kernel-dev-a46f9484f8926aacb2e79a0e1676de3a6a6fbae8.zip op-kernel-dev-a46f9484f8926aacb2e79a0e1676de3a6a6fbae8.tar.gz |
[PATCH] mthca: initialize send and receive queue locks separately
mthca: initialize send and receive queue locks separately
lockdep identifies a lock by the call site of its initialization. By
initializing the send and receive queue locks in mthca_wq_init() we confuse
lockdep. It warns that that the ordered acquiry of both locks in
mthca_modify_qp() is recursive acquiry of one lock:
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
---------------------------------------------
modprobe/1192 is trying to acquire lock:
(&wq->lock){....}, at: [<f892b4db>] mthca_modify_qp+0x60/0xa7b [ib_mthca]
but task is already holding lock:
(&wq->lock){....}, at: [<f892b4ce>] mthca_modify_qp+0x53/0xa7b [ib_mthca]
Initializing the locks separately in mthca_alloc_qp_common() stops the
warning and will let lockdep enforce proper ordering on paths that acquire
both locks.
Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Makefile')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions