summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2012-03-23 16:59:10 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2012-03-23 16:59:10 -0700
commit8e3ade251bc7c0a4f0777df4dd34343a03efadba (patch)
tree6c0b78731e3d6609057951d07660efbd90992ad0 /Documentation
parente317234975cb7463b8ca21a93bb6862d9dcf113f (diff)
parente075f59152890ffd7e3d704afc997dd686c8a781 (diff)
downloadop-kernel-dev-8e3ade251bc7c0a4f0777df4dd34343a03efadba.zip
op-kernel-dev-8e3ade251bc7c0a4f0777df4dd34343a03efadba.tar.gz
Merge branch 'akpm' (Andrew's patch-bomb)
Merge second batch of patches from Andrew Morton: - various misc things - core kernel changes to prctl, exit, exec, init, etc. - kernel/watchdog.c updates - get_maintainer - MAINTAINERS - the backlight driver queue - core bitops code cleanups - the led driver queue - some core prio_tree work - checkpatch udpates - largeish crc32 update - a new poll() feature for the v4l guys - the rtc driver queue - fatfs - ptrace - signals - kmod/usermodehelper updates - coredump - procfs updates * emailed from Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>: (141 commits) seq_file: add seq_set_overflow(), seq_overflow() proc-ns: use d_set_d_op() API to set dentry ops in proc_ns_instantiate(). procfs: speed up /proc/pid/stat, statm procfs: add num_to_str() to speed up /proc/stat proc: speed up /proc/stat handling fs/proc/kcore.c: make get_sparsemem_vmemmap_info() static coredump: add VM_NODUMP, MADV_NODUMP, MADV_CLEAR_NODUMP coredump: remove VM_ALWAYSDUMP flag kmod: make __request_module() killable kmod: introduce call_modprobe() helper usermodehelper: ____call_usermodehelper() doesn't need do_exit() usermodehelper: kill umh_wait, renumber UMH_* constants usermodehelper: implement UMH_KILLABLE usermodehelper: introduce umh_complete(sub_info) usermodehelper: use UMH_WAIT_PROC consistently signal: zap_pid_ns_processes: s/SEND_SIG_NOINFO/SEND_SIG_FORCED/ signal: oom_kill_task: use SEND_SIG_FORCED instead of force_sig() signal: cosmetic, s/from_ancestor_ns/force/ in prepare_signal() paths signal: give SEND_SIG_FORCED more power to beat SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE Hexagon: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask() ...
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/00-INDEX2
-rw-r--r--Documentation/backlight/lp855x-driver.txt78
-rw-r--r--Documentation/crc32.txt182
-rw-r--r--Documentation/leds/leds-lp5521.txt63
4 files changed, 325 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/00-INDEX b/Documentation/00-INDEX
index a1a6432..2214f12 100644
--- a/Documentation/00-INDEX
+++ b/Documentation/00-INDEX
@@ -104,6 +104,8 @@ cpuidle/
- info on CPU_IDLE, CPU idle state management subsystem.
cputopology.txt
- documentation on how CPU topology info is exported via sysfs.
+crc32.txt
+ - brief tutorial on CRC computation
cris/
- directory with info about Linux on CRIS architecture.
crypto/
diff --git a/Documentation/backlight/lp855x-driver.txt b/Documentation/backlight/lp855x-driver.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f5e4caa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/backlight/lp855x-driver.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+Kernel driver lp855x
+====================
+
+Backlight driver for LP855x ICs
+
+Supported chips:
+ Texas Instruments LP8550, LP8551, LP8552, LP8553 and LP8556
+
+Author: Milo(Woogyom) Kim <milo.kim@ti.com>
+
+Description
+-----------
+
+* Brightness control
+
+Brightness can be controlled by the pwm input or the i2c command.
+The lp855x driver supports both cases.
+
+* Device attributes
+
+1) bl_ctl_mode
+Backlight control mode.
+Value : pwm based or register based
+
+2) chip_id
+The lp855x chip id.
+Value : lp8550/lp8551/lp8552/lp8553/lp8556
+
+Platform data for lp855x
+------------------------
+
+For supporting platform specific data, the lp855x platform data can be used.
+
+* name : Backlight driver name. If it is not defined, default name is set.
+* mode : Brightness control mode. PWM or register based.
+* device_control : Value of DEVICE CONTROL register.
+* initial_brightness : Initial value of backlight brightness.
+* pwm_data : Platform specific pwm generation functions.
+ Only valid when brightness is pwm input mode.
+ Functions should be implemented by PWM driver.
+ - pwm_set_intensity() : set duty of PWM
+ - pwm_get_intensity() : get current duty of PWM
+* load_new_rom_data :
+ 0 : use default configuration data
+ 1 : update values of eeprom or eprom registers on loading driver
+* size_program : Total size of lp855x_rom_data.
+* rom_data : List of new eeprom/eprom registers.
+
+example 1) lp8552 platform data : i2c register mode with new eeprom data
+
+#define EEPROM_A5_ADDR 0xA5
+#define EEPROM_A5_VAL 0x4f /* EN_VSYNC=0 */
+
+static struct lp855x_rom_data lp8552_eeprom_arr[] = {
+ {EEPROM_A5_ADDR, EEPROM_A5_VAL},
+};
+
+static struct lp855x_platform_data lp8552_pdata = {
+ .name = "lcd-bl",
+ .mode = REGISTER_BASED,
+ .device_control = I2C_CONFIG(LP8552),
+ .initial_brightness = INITIAL_BRT,
+ .load_new_rom_data = 1,
+ .size_program = ARRAY_SIZE(lp8552_eeprom_arr),
+ .rom_data = lp8552_eeprom_arr,
+};
+
+example 2) lp8556 platform data : pwm input mode with default rom data
+
+static struct lp855x_platform_data lp8556_pdata = {
+ .mode = PWM_BASED,
+ .device_control = PWM_CONFIG(LP8556),
+ .initial_brightness = INITIAL_BRT,
+ .pwm_data = {
+ .pwm_set_intensity = platform_pwm_set_intensity,
+ .pwm_get_intensity = platform_pwm_get_intensity,
+ },
+};
diff --git a/Documentation/crc32.txt b/Documentation/crc32.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a08a7dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/crc32.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+A brief CRC tutorial.
+
+A CRC is a long-division remainder. You add the CRC to the message,
+and the whole thing (message+CRC) is a multiple of the given
+CRC polynomial. To check the CRC, you can either check that the
+CRC matches the recomputed value, *or* you can check that the
+remainder computed on the message+CRC is 0. This latter approach
+is used by a lot of hardware implementations, and is why so many
+protocols put the end-of-frame flag after the CRC.
+
+It's actually the same long division you learned in school, except that
+- We're working in binary, so the digits are only 0 and 1, and
+- When dividing polynomials, there are no carries. Rather than add and
+ subtract, we just xor. Thus, we tend to get a bit sloppy about
+ the difference between adding and subtracting.
+
+Like all division, the remainder is always smaller than the divisor.
+To produce a 32-bit CRC, the divisor is actually a 33-bit CRC polynomial.
+Since it's 33 bits long, bit 32 is always going to be set, so usually the
+CRC is written in hex with the most significant bit omitted. (If you're
+familiar with the IEEE 754 floating-point format, it's the same idea.)
+
+Note that a CRC is computed over a string of *bits*, so you have
+to decide on the endianness of the bits within each byte. To get
+the best error-detecting properties, this should correspond to the
+order they're actually sent. For example, standard RS-232 serial is
+little-endian; the most significant bit (sometimes used for parity)
+is sent last. And when appending a CRC word to a message, you should
+do it in the right order, matching the endianness.
+
+Just like with ordinary division, you proceed one digit (bit) at a time.
+Each step of the division you take one more digit (bit) of the dividend
+and append it to the current remainder. Then you figure out the
+appropriate multiple of the divisor to subtract to being the remainder
+back into range. In binary, this is easy - it has to be either 0 or 1,
+and to make the XOR cancel, it's just a copy of bit 32 of the remainder.
+
+When computing a CRC, we don't care about the quotient, so we can
+throw the quotient bit away, but subtract the appropriate multiple of
+the polynomial from the remainder and we're back to where we started,
+ready to process the next bit.
+
+A big-endian CRC written this way would be coded like:
+for (i = 0; i < input_bits; i++) {
+ multiple = remainder & 0x80000000 ? CRCPOLY : 0;
+ remainder = (remainder << 1 | next_input_bit()) ^ multiple;
+}
+
+Notice how, to get at bit 32 of the shifted remainder, we look
+at bit 31 of the remainder *before* shifting it.
+
+But also notice how the next_input_bit() bits we're shifting into
+the remainder don't actually affect any decision-making until
+32 bits later. Thus, the first 32 cycles of this are pretty boring.
+Also, to add the CRC to a message, we need a 32-bit-long hole for it at
+the end, so we have to add 32 extra cycles shifting in zeros at the
+end of every message,
+
+These details lead to a standard trick: rearrange merging in the
+next_input_bit() until the moment it's needed. Then the first 32 cycles
+can be precomputed, and merging in the final 32 zero bits to make room
+for the CRC can be skipped entirely. This changes the code to:
+
+for (i = 0; i < input_bits; i++) {
+ remainder ^= next_input_bit() << 31;
+ multiple = (remainder & 0x80000000) ? CRCPOLY : 0;
+ remainder = (remainder << 1) ^ multiple;
+}
+
+With this optimization, the little-endian code is particularly simple:
+for (i = 0; i < input_bits; i++) {
+ remainder ^= next_input_bit();
+ multiple = (remainder & 1) ? CRCPOLY : 0;
+ remainder = (remainder >> 1) ^ multiple;
+}
+
+The most significant coefficient of the remainder polynomial is stored
+in the least significant bit of the binary "remainder" variable.
+The other details of endianness have been hidden in CRCPOLY (which must
+be bit-reversed) and next_input_bit().
+
+As long as next_input_bit is returning the bits in a sensible order, we don't
+*have* to wait until the last possible moment to merge in additional bits.
+We can do it 8 bits at a time rather than 1 bit at a time:
+for (i = 0; i < input_bytes; i++) {
+ remainder ^= next_input_byte() << 24;
+ for (j = 0; j < 8; j++) {
+ multiple = (remainder & 0x80000000) ? CRCPOLY : 0;
+ remainder = (remainder << 1) ^ multiple;
+ }
+}
+
+Or in little-endian:
+for (i = 0; i < input_bytes; i++) {
+ remainder ^= next_input_byte();
+ for (j = 0; j < 8; j++) {
+ multiple = (remainder & 1) ? CRCPOLY : 0;
+ remainder = (remainder >> 1) ^ multiple;
+ }
+}
+
+If the input is a multiple of 32 bits, you can even XOR in a 32-bit
+word at a time and increase the inner loop count to 32.
+
+You can also mix and match the two loop styles, for example doing the
+bulk of a message byte-at-a-time and adding bit-at-a-time processing
+for any fractional bytes at the end.
+
+To reduce the number of conditional branches, software commonly uses
+the byte-at-a-time table method, popularized by Dilip V. Sarwate,
+"Computation of Cyclic Redundancy Checks via Table Look-Up", Comm. ACM
+v.31 no.8 (August 1998) p. 1008-1013.
+
+Here, rather than just shifting one bit of the remainder to decide
+in the correct multiple to subtract, we can shift a byte at a time.
+This produces a 40-bit (rather than a 33-bit) intermediate remainder,
+and the correct multiple of the polynomial to subtract is found using
+a 256-entry lookup table indexed by the high 8 bits.
+
+(The table entries are simply the CRC-32 of the given one-byte messages.)
+
+When space is more constrained, smaller tables can be used, e.g. two
+4-bit shifts followed by a lookup in a 16-entry table.
+
+It is not practical to process much more than 8 bits at a time using this
+technique, because tables larger than 256 entries use too much memory and,
+more importantly, too much of the L1 cache.
+
+To get higher software performance, a "slicing" technique can be used.
+See "High Octane CRC Generation with the Intel Slicing-by-8 Algorithm",
+ftp://download.intel.com/technology/comms/perfnet/download/slicing-by-8.pdf
+
+This does not change the number of table lookups, but does increase
+the parallelism. With the classic Sarwate algorithm, each table lookup
+must be completed before the index of the next can be computed.
+
+A "slicing by 2" technique would shift the remainder 16 bits at a time,
+producing a 48-bit intermediate remainder. Rather than doing a single
+lookup in a 65536-entry table, the two high bytes are looked up in
+two different 256-entry tables. Each contains the remainder required
+to cancel out the corresponding byte. The tables are different because the
+polynomials to cancel are different. One has non-zero coefficients from
+x^32 to x^39, while the other goes from x^40 to x^47.
+
+Since modern processors can handle many parallel memory operations, this
+takes barely longer than a single table look-up and thus performs almost
+twice as fast as the basic Sarwate algorithm.
+
+This can be extended to "slicing by 4" using 4 256-entry tables.
+Each step, 32 bits of data is fetched, XORed with the CRC, and the result
+broken into bytes and looked up in the tables. Because the 32-bit shift
+leaves the low-order bits of the intermediate remainder zero, the
+final CRC is simply the XOR of the 4 table look-ups.
+
+But this still enforces sequential execution: a second group of table
+look-ups cannot begin until the previous groups 4 table look-ups have all
+been completed. Thus, the processor's load/store unit is sometimes idle.
+
+To make maximum use of the processor, "slicing by 8" performs 8 look-ups
+in parallel. Each step, the 32-bit CRC is shifted 64 bits and XORed
+with 64 bits of input data. What is important to note is that 4 of
+those 8 bytes are simply copies of the input data; they do not depend
+on the previous CRC at all. Thus, those 4 table look-ups may commence
+immediately, without waiting for the previous loop iteration.
+
+By always having 4 loads in flight, a modern superscalar processor can
+be kept busy and make full use of its L1 cache.
+
+Two more details about CRC implementation in the real world:
+
+Normally, appending zero bits to a message which is already a multiple
+of a polynomial produces a larger multiple of that polynomial. Thus,
+a basic CRC will not detect appended zero bits (or bytes). To enable
+a CRC to detect this condition, it's common to invert the CRC before
+appending it. This makes the remainder of the message+crc come out not
+as zero, but some fixed non-zero value. (The CRC of the inversion
+pattern, 0xffffffff.)
+
+The same problem applies to zero bits prepended to the message, and a
+similar solution is used. Instead of starting the CRC computation with
+a remainder of 0, an initial remainder of all ones is used. As long as
+you start the same way on decoding, it doesn't make a difference.
diff --git a/Documentation/leds/leds-lp5521.txt b/Documentation/leds/leds-lp5521.txt
index c4d8d15..0e542ab 100644
--- a/Documentation/leds/leds-lp5521.txt
+++ b/Documentation/leds/leds-lp5521.txt
@@ -43,17 +43,23 @@ Format: 10x mA i.e 10 means 1.0 mA
example platform data:
Note: chan_nr can have values between 0 and 2.
+The name of each channel can be configurable.
+If the name field is not defined, the default name will be set to 'xxxx:channelN'
+(XXXX : pdata->label or i2c client name, N : channel number)
static struct lp5521_led_config lp5521_led_config[] = {
{
+ .name = "red",
.chan_nr = 0,
.led_current = 50,
.max_current = 130,
}, {
+ .name = "green",
.chan_nr = 1,
.led_current = 0,
.max_current = 130,
}, {
+ .name = "blue",
.chan_nr = 2,
.led_current = 0,
.max_current = 130,
@@ -86,3 +92,60 @@ static struct lp5521_platform_data lp5521_platform_data = {
If the current is set to 0 in the platform data, that channel is
disabled and it is not visible in the sysfs.
+
+The 'update_config' : CONFIG register (ADDR 08h)
+This value is platform-specific data.
+If update_config is not defined, the CONFIG register is set with
+'LP5521_PWRSAVE_EN | LP5521_CP_MODE_AUTO | LP5521_R_TO_BATT'.
+(Enable auto-powersave, set charge pump to auto, red to battery)
+
+example of update_config :
+
+#define LP5521_CONFIGS (LP5521_PWM_HF | LP5521_PWRSAVE_EN | \
+ LP5521_CP_MODE_AUTO | LP5521_R_TO_BATT | \
+ LP5521_CLK_INT)
+
+static struct lp5521_platform_data lp5521_pdata = {
+ .led_config = lp5521_led_config,
+ .num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(lp5521_led_config),
+ .clock_mode = LP5521_CLOCK_INT,
+ .update_config = LP5521_CONFIGS,
+};
+
+LED patterns : LP5521 has autonomous operation without external control.
+Pattern data can be defined in the platform data.
+
+example of led pattern data :
+
+/* RGB(50,5,0) 500ms on, 500ms off, infinite loop */
+static u8 pattern_red[] = {
+ 0x40, 0x32, 0x60, 0x00, 0x40, 0x00, 0x60, 0x00,
+ };
+
+static u8 pattern_green[] = {
+ 0x40, 0x05, 0x60, 0x00, 0x40, 0x00, 0x60, 0x00,
+ };
+
+static struct lp5521_led_pattern board_led_patterns[] = {
+ {
+ .r = pattern_red,
+ .g = pattern_green,
+ .size_r = ARRAY_SIZE(pattern_red),
+ .size_g = ARRAY_SIZE(pattern_green),
+ },
+};
+
+static struct lp5521_platform_data lp5521_platform_data = {
+ .led_config = lp5521_led_config,
+ .num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(lp5521_led_config),
+ .clock_mode = LP5521_CLOCK_EXT,
+ .patterns = board_led_patterns,
+ .num_patterns = ARRAY_SIZE(board_led_patterns),
+};
+
+Then predefined led pattern(s) can be executed via the sysfs.
+To start the pattern #1,
+# echo 1 > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/xxxx/led_pattern
+(xxxx : i2c bus & slave address)
+To end the pattern,
+# echo 0 > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/xxxx/led_pattern
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud