memcg: handle swap caches

SwapCache support for memory resource controller (memcg)

Before mem+swap controller, memcg itself should handle SwapCache in proper
way.  This is cut-out from it.

In current memcg, SwapCache is just leaked and the user can create tons of
SwapCache.  This is a leak of account and should be handled.

SwapCache accounting is done as following.

  charge (anon)
	- charged when it's mapped.
	  (because of readahead, charge at add_to_swap_cache() is not sane)
  uncharge (anon)
	- uncharged when it's dropped from swapcache and fully unmapped.
	  means it's not uncharged at unmap.
	  Note: delete from swap cache at swap-in is done after rmap information
	        is established.
  charge (shmem)
	- charged at swap-in. this prevents charge at add_to_page_cache().

  uncharge (shmem)
	- uncharged when it's dropped from swapcache and not on shmem's
	  radix-tree.

  at migration, check against 'old page' is modified to handle shmem.

Comparing to the old version discussed (and caused troubles), we have
advantages of
  - PCG_USED bit.
  - simple migrating handling.

So, situation is much easier than several months ago, maybe.

[hugh@veritas.com: memcg: handle swap caches build fix]
Reviewed-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Tested-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/controllers/memory.txt b/Documentation/controllers/memory.txt
index 54253b7..9fe2d0e 100644
--- a/Documentation/controllers/memory.txt
+++ b/Documentation/controllers/memory.txt
@@ -137,6 +137,11 @@ behind this approach is that a cgroup that aggressively uses a shared
 page will eventually get charged for it (once it is uncharged from
 the cgroup that brought it in -- this will happen on memory pressure).
 
+Exception: When you do swapoff and make swapped-out pages of shmem(tmpfs) to
+be backed into memory in force, charges for pages are accounted against the
+caller of swapoff rather than the users of shmem.
+
+
 2.4 Reclaim
 
 Each cgroup maintains a per cgroup LRU that consists of an active