seccomp: Don't special case audited processes when logging

Seccomp logging for "handled" actions such as RET_TRAP, RET_TRACE, or
RET_ERRNO can be very noisy for processes that are being audited. This
patch modifies the seccomp logging behavior to treat processes that are
being inspected via the audit subsystem the same as processes that
aren't under inspection. Handled actions will no longer be logged just
because the process is being inspected. Since v4.14, applications have
the ability to request logging of handled actions by using the
SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG flag when loading seccomp filters.

With this patch, the logic for deciding if an action will be logged is:

  if action == RET_ALLOW:
    do not log
  else if action not in actions_logged:
    do not log
  else if action == RET_KILL:
    log
  else if action == RET_LOG:
    log
  else if filter-requests-logging:
    log
  else:
    do not log

Reported-by: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst
index 099c412..82a468b 100644
--- a/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst
+++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst
@@ -207,13 +207,6 @@ directory. Here's a description of each file in that directory:
 	to the file do not need to be in ordered form but reads from the file
 	will be ordered in the same way as the actions_avail sysctl.
 
-	It is important to note that the value of ``actions_logged`` does not
-	prevent certain actions from being logged when the audit subsystem is
-	configured to audit a task. If the action is not found in
-	``actions_logged`` list, the final decision on whether to audit the
-	action for that task is ultimately left up to the audit subsystem to
-	decide for all seccomp return values other than ``SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW``.
-
 	The ``allow`` string is not accepted in the ``actions_logged`` sysctl
 	as it is not possible to log ``SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW`` actions. Attempting
 	to write ``allow`` to the sysctl will result in an EINVAL being