seccomp: Implement SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS action

Right now, SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD (neé SECCOMP_RET_KILL) kills the
current thread. There have been a few requests for this to kill the entire
process (the thread group). This cannot be just changed (discovered when
adding coredump support since coredumping kills the entire process)
because there are userspace programs depending on the thread-kill
behavior.

Instead, implement SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS, which is 0x80000000, and can
be processed as "-1" by the kernel, below the existing RET_KILL that is
ABI-set to "0". For userspace, SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL is added to expand
the mask to the signed bit. Old userspace using the SECCOMP_RET_ACTION
mask will see SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS as 0 still, but this would only
be visible when examining the siginfo in a core dump from a RET_KILL_*,
where it will think it was thread-killed instead of process-killed.

Attempts to introduce this behavior via other ways (filter flags,
seccomp struct flags, masked RET_DATA bits) all come with weird
side-effects and baggage. This change preserves the central behavioral
expectations of the seccomp filter engine without putting too great
a burden on changes needed in userspace to use the new action.

The new action is discoverable by userspace through either the new
actions_avail sysctl or through the SECCOMP_GET_ACTION_AVAIL seccomp
operation. If used without checking for availability, old kernels
will treat RET_KILL_PROCESS as RET_KILL_THREAD (since the old mask
will produce RET_KILL_THREAD).

Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Fabricio Voznika <fvoznika@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst
index d76396f..099c412 100644
--- a/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst
+++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst
@@ -87,10 +87,15 @@ Return values
 A seccomp filter may return any of the following values. If multiple
 filters exist, the return value for the evaluation of a given system
 call will always use the highest precedent value. (For example,
-``SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD`` will always take precedence.)
+``SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS`` will always take precedence.)
 
 In precedence order, they are:
 
+``SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS``:
+	Results in the entire process exiting immediately without executing
+	the system call.  The exit status of the task (``status & 0x7f``)
+	will be ``SIGSYS``, not ``SIGKILL``.
+
 ``SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD``:
 	Results in the task exiting immediately without executing the
 	system call.  The exit status of the task (``status & 0x7f``) will