docs-rst: add documents to development-process

Add several documents to the development-process ReST book.

As we don't want renames, use symlinks instead, keeping those
documents on their original place.

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1062 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/CodingStyle b/Documentation/CodingStyle
deleted file mode 100644
index 9c61c03..0000000
--- a/Documentation/CodingStyle
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,1062 +0,0 @@
-.. _codingstyle:
-
-Linux kernel coding style
-=========================
-
-This is a short document describing the preferred coding style for the
-linux kernel.  Coding style is very personal, and I won't **force** my
-views on anybody, but this is what goes for anything that I have to be
-able to maintain, and I'd prefer it for most other things too.  Please
-at least consider the points made here.
-
-First off, I'd suggest printing out a copy of the GNU coding standards,
-and NOT read it.  Burn them, it's a great symbolic gesture.
-
-Anyway, here goes:
-
-
-1) Indentation
---------------
-
-Tabs are 8 characters, and thus indentations are also 8 characters.
-There are heretic movements that try to make indentations 4 (or even 2!)
-characters deep, and that is akin to trying to define the value of PI to
-be 3.
-
-Rationale: The whole idea behind indentation is to clearly define where
-a block of control starts and ends.  Especially when you've been looking
-at your screen for 20 straight hours, you'll find it a lot easier to see
-how the indentation works if you have large indentations.
-
-Now, some people will claim that having 8-character indentations makes
-the code move too far to the right, and makes it hard to read on a
-80-character terminal screen.  The answer to that is that if you need
-more than 3 levels of indentation, you're screwed anyway, and should fix
-your program.
-
-In short, 8-char indents make things easier to read, and have the added
-benefit of warning you when you're nesting your functions too deep.
-Heed that warning.
-
-The preferred way to ease multiple indentation levels in a switch statement is
-to align the ``switch`` and its subordinate ``case`` labels in the same column
-instead of ``double-indenting`` the ``case`` labels.  E.g.:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	switch (suffix) {
-	case 'G':
-	case 'g':
-		mem <<= 30;
-		break;
-	case 'M':
-	case 'm':
-		mem <<= 20;
-		break;
-	case 'K':
-	case 'k':
-		mem <<= 10;
-		/* fall through */
-	default:
-		break;
-	}
-
-Don't put multiple statements on a single line unless you have
-something to hide:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	if (condition) do_this;
-	  do_something_everytime;
-
-Don't put multiple assignments on a single line either.  Kernel coding style
-is super simple.  Avoid tricky expressions.
-
-Outside of comments, documentation and except in Kconfig, spaces are never
-used for indentation, and the above example is deliberately broken.
-
-Get a decent editor and don't leave whitespace at the end of lines.
-
-
-2) Breaking long lines and strings
-----------------------------------
-
-Coding style is all about readability and maintainability using commonly
-available tools.
-
-The limit on the length of lines is 80 columns and this is a strongly
-preferred limit.
-
-Statements longer than 80 columns will be broken into sensible chunks, unless
-exceeding 80 columns significantly increases readability and does not hide
-information. Descendants are always substantially shorter than the parent and
-are placed substantially to the right. The same applies to function headers
-with a long argument list. However, never break user-visible strings such as
-printk messages, because that breaks the ability to grep for them.
-
-
-3) Placing Braces and Spaces
-----------------------------
-
-The other issue that always comes up in C styling is the placement of
-braces.  Unlike the indent size, there are few technical reasons to
-choose one placement strategy over the other, but the preferred way, as
-shown to us by the prophets Kernighan and Ritchie, is to put the opening
-brace last on the line, and put the closing brace first, thusly:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	if (x is true) {
-		we do y
-	}
-
-This applies to all non-function statement blocks (if, switch, for,
-while, do).  E.g.:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	switch (action) {
-	case KOBJ_ADD:
-		return "add";
-	case KOBJ_REMOVE:
-		return "remove";
-	case KOBJ_CHANGE:
-		return "change";
-	default:
-		return NULL;
-	}
-
-However, there is one special case, namely functions: they have the
-opening brace at the beginning of the next line, thus:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	int function(int x)
-	{
-		body of function
-	}
-
-Heretic people all over the world have claimed that this inconsistency
-is ...  well ...  inconsistent, but all right-thinking people know that
-(a) K&R are **right** and (b) K&R are right.  Besides, functions are
-special anyway (you can't nest them in C).
-
-Note that the closing brace is empty on a line of its own, **except** in
-the cases where it is followed by a continuation of the same statement,
-ie a ``while`` in a do-statement or an ``else`` in an if-statement, like
-this:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	do {
-		body of do-loop
-	} while (condition);
-
-and
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	if (x == y) {
-		..
-	} else if (x > y) {
-		...
-	} else {
-		....
-	}
-
-Rationale: K&R.
-
-Also, note that this brace-placement also minimizes the number of empty
-(or almost empty) lines, without any loss of readability.  Thus, as the
-supply of new-lines on your screen is not a renewable resource (think
-25-line terminal screens here), you have more empty lines to put
-comments on.
-
-Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	if (condition)
-		action();
-
-and
-
-.. code-block:: none
-
-	if (condition)
-		do_this();
-	else
-		do_that();
-
-This does not apply if only one branch of a conditional statement is a single
-statement; in the latter case use braces in both branches:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	if (condition) {
-		do_this();
-		do_that();
-	} else {
-		otherwise();
-	}
-
-3.1) Spaces
-***********
-
-Linux kernel style for use of spaces depends (mostly) on
-function-versus-keyword usage.  Use a space after (most) keywords.  The
-notable exceptions are sizeof, typeof, alignof, and __attribute__, which look
-somewhat like functions (and are usually used with parentheses in Linux,
-although they are not required in the language, as in: ``sizeof info`` after
-``struct fileinfo info;`` is declared).
-
-So use a space after these keywords::
-
-	if, switch, case, for, do, while
-
-but not with sizeof, typeof, alignof, or __attribute__.  E.g.,
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-
-	s = sizeof(struct file);
-
-Do not add spaces around (inside) parenthesized expressions.  This example is
-**bad**:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-
-	s = sizeof( struct file );
-
-When declaring pointer data or a function that returns a pointer type, the
-preferred use of ``*`` is adjacent to the data name or function name and not
-adjacent to the type name.  Examples:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-
-	char *linux_banner;
-	unsigned long long memparse(char *ptr, char **retptr);
-	char *match_strdup(substring_t *s);
-
-Use one space around (on each side of) most binary and ternary operators,
-such as any of these::
-
-	=  +  -  <  >  *  /  %  |  &  ^  <=  >=  ==  !=  ?  :
-
-but no space after unary operators::
-
-	&  *  +  -  ~  !  sizeof  typeof  alignof  __attribute__  defined
-
-no space before the postfix increment & decrement unary operators::
-
-	++  --
-
-no space after the prefix increment & decrement unary operators::
-
-	++  --
-
-and no space around the ``.`` and ``->`` structure member operators.
-
-Do not leave trailing whitespace at the ends of lines.  Some editors with
-``smart`` indentation will insert whitespace at the beginning of new lines as
-appropriate, so you can start typing the next line of code right away.
-However, some such editors do not remove the whitespace if you end up not
-putting a line of code there, such as if you leave a blank line.  As a result,
-you end up with lines containing trailing whitespace.
-
-Git will warn you about patches that introduce trailing whitespace, and can
-optionally strip the trailing whitespace for you; however, if applying a series
-of patches, this may make later patches in the series fail by changing their
-context lines.
-
-
-4) Naming
----------
-
-C is a Spartan language, and so should your naming be.  Unlike Modula-2
-and Pascal programmers, C programmers do not use cute names like
-ThisVariableIsATemporaryCounter.  A C programmer would call that
-variable ``tmp``, which is much easier to write, and not the least more
-difficult to understand.
-
-HOWEVER, while mixed-case names are frowned upon, descriptive names for
-global variables are a must.  To call a global function ``foo`` is a
-shooting offense.
-
-GLOBAL variables (to be used only if you **really** need them) need to
-have descriptive names, as do global functions.  If you have a function
-that counts the number of active users, you should call that
-``count_active_users()`` or similar, you should **not** call it ``cntusr()``.
-
-Encoding the type of a function into the name (so-called Hungarian
-notation) is brain damaged - the compiler knows the types anyway and can
-check those, and it only confuses the programmer.  No wonder MicroSoft
-makes buggy programs.
-
-LOCAL variable names should be short, and to the point.  If you have
-some random integer loop counter, it should probably be called ``i``.
-Calling it ``loop_counter`` is non-productive, if there is no chance of it
-being mis-understood.  Similarly, ``tmp`` can be just about any type of
-variable that is used to hold a temporary value.
-
-If you are afraid to mix up your local variable names, you have another
-problem, which is called the function-growth-hormone-imbalance syndrome.
-See chapter 6 (Functions).
-
-
-5) Typedefs
------------
-
-Please don't use things like ``vps_t``.
-It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. When you see a
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-
-	vps_t a;
-
-in the source, what does it mean?
-In contrast, if it says
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	struct virtual_container *a;
-
-you can actually tell what ``a`` is.
-
-Lots of people think that typedefs ``help readability``. Not so. They are
-useful only for:
-
- (a) totally opaque objects (where the typedef is actively used to **hide**
-     what the object is).
-
-     Example: ``pte_t`` etc. opaque objects that you can only access using
-     the proper accessor functions.
-
-     .. note::
-
-       Opaqueness and ``accessor functions`` are not good in themselves.
-       The reason we have them for things like pte_t etc. is that there
-       really is absolutely **zero** portably accessible information there.
-
- (b) Clear integer types, where the abstraction **helps** avoid confusion
-     whether it is ``int`` or ``long``.
-
-     u8/u16/u32 are perfectly fine typedefs, although they fit into
-     category (d) better than here.
-
-     .. note::
-
-       Again - there needs to be a **reason** for this. If something is
-       ``unsigned long``, then there's no reason to do
-
-	typedef unsigned long myflags_t;
-
-     but if there is a clear reason for why it under certain circumstances
-     might be an ``unsigned int`` and under other configurations might be
-     ``unsigned long``, then by all means go ahead and use a typedef.
-
- (c) when you use sparse to literally create a **new** type for
-     type-checking.
-
- (d) New types which are identical to standard C99 types, in certain
-     exceptional circumstances.
-
-     Although it would only take a short amount of time for the eyes and
-     brain to become accustomed to the standard types like ``uint32_t``,
-     some people object to their use anyway.
-
-     Therefore, the Linux-specific ``u8/u16/u32/u64`` types and their
-     signed equivalents which are identical to standard types are
-     permitted -- although they are not mandatory in new code of your
-     own.
-
-     When editing existing code which already uses one or the other set
-     of types, you should conform to the existing choices in that code.
-
- (e) Types safe for use in userspace.
-
-     In certain structures which are visible to userspace, we cannot
-     require C99 types and cannot use the ``u32`` form above. Thus, we
-     use __u32 and similar types in all structures which are shared
-     with userspace.
-
-Maybe there are other cases too, but the rule should basically be to NEVER
-EVER use a typedef unless you can clearly match one of those rules.
-
-In general, a pointer, or a struct that has elements that can reasonably
-be directly accessed should **never** be a typedef.
-
-
-6) Functions
-------------
-
-Functions should be short and sweet, and do just one thing.  They should
-fit on one or two screenfuls of text (the ISO/ANSI screen size is 80x24,
-as we all know), and do one thing and do that well.
-
-The maximum length of a function is inversely proportional to the
-complexity and indentation level of that function.  So, if you have a
-conceptually simple function that is just one long (but simple)
-case-statement, where you have to do lots of small things for a lot of
-different cases, it's OK to have a longer function.
-
-However, if you have a complex function, and you suspect that a
-less-than-gifted first-year high-school student might not even
-understand what the function is all about, you should adhere to the
-maximum limits all the more closely.  Use helper functions with
-descriptive names (you can ask the compiler to in-line them if you think
-it's performance-critical, and it will probably do a better job of it
-than you would have done).
-
-Another measure of the function is the number of local variables.  They
-shouldn't exceed 5-10, or you're doing something wrong.  Re-think the
-function, and split it into smaller pieces.  A human brain can
-generally easily keep track of about 7 different things, anything more
-and it gets confused.  You know you're brilliant, but maybe you'd like
-to understand what you did 2 weeks from now.
-
-In source files, separate functions with one blank line.  If the function is
-exported, the **EXPORT** macro for it should follow immediately after the
-closing function brace line.  E.g.:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	int system_is_up(void)
-	{
-		return system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING;
-	}
-	EXPORT_SYMBOL(system_is_up);
-
-In function prototypes, include parameter names with their data types.
-Although this is not required by the C language, it is preferred in Linux
-because it is a simple way to add valuable information for the reader.
-
-
-7) Centralized exiting of functions
------------------------------------
-
-Albeit deprecated by some people, the equivalent of the goto statement is
-used frequently by compilers in form of the unconditional jump instruction.
-
-The goto statement comes in handy when a function exits from multiple
-locations and some common work such as cleanup has to be done.  If there is no
-cleanup needed then just return directly.
-
-Choose label names which say what the goto does or why the goto exists.  An
-example of a good name could be ``out_free_buffer:`` if the goto frees ``buffer``.
-Avoid using GW-BASIC names like ``err1:`` and ``err2:``, as you would have to
-renumber them if you ever add or remove exit paths, and they make correctness
-difficult to verify anyway.
-
-The rationale for using gotos is:
-
-- unconditional statements are easier to understand and follow
-- nesting is reduced
-- errors by not updating individual exit points when making
-  modifications are prevented
-- saves the compiler work to optimize redundant code away ;)
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	int fun(int a)
-	{
-		int result = 0;
-		char *buffer;
-
-		buffer = kmalloc(SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (!buffer)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-
-		if (condition1) {
-			while (loop1) {
-				...
-			}
-			result = 1;
-			goto out_buffer;
-		}
-		...
-	out_free_buffer:
-		kfree(buffer);
-		return result;
-	}
-
-A common type of bug to be aware of is ``one err bugs`` which look like this:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	err:
-		kfree(foo->bar);
-		kfree(foo);
-		return ret;
-
-The bug in this code is that on some exit paths ``foo`` is NULL.  Normally the
-fix for this is to split it up into two error labels ``err_free_bar:`` and
-``err_free_foo:``:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	 err_free_bar:
-		kfree(foo->bar);
-	 err_free_foo:
-		kfree(foo);
-		return ret;
-
-Ideally you should simulate errors to test all exit paths.
-
-
-8) Commenting
--------------
-
-Comments are good, but there is also a danger of over-commenting.  NEVER
-try to explain HOW your code works in a comment: it's much better to
-write the code so that the **working** is obvious, and it's a waste of
-time to explain badly written code.
-
-Generally, you want your comments to tell WHAT your code does, not HOW.
-Also, try to avoid putting comments inside a function body: if the
-function is so complex that you need to separately comment parts of it,
-you should probably go back to chapter 6 for a while.  You can make
-small comments to note or warn about something particularly clever (or
-ugly), but try to avoid excess.  Instead, put the comments at the head
-of the function, telling people what it does, and possibly WHY it does
-it.
-
-When commenting the kernel API functions, please use the kernel-doc format.
-See the files Documentation/kernel-documentation.rst and scripts/kernel-doc
-for details.
-
-The preferred style for long (multi-line) comments is:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	/*
-	 * This is the preferred style for multi-line
-	 * comments in the Linux kernel source code.
-	 * Please use it consistently.
-	 *
-	 * Description:  A column of asterisks on the left side,
-	 * with beginning and ending almost-blank lines.
-	 */
-
-For files in net/ and drivers/net/ the preferred style for long (multi-line)
-comments is a little different.
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	/* The preferred comment style for files in net/ and drivers/net
-	 * looks like this.
-	 *
-	 * It is nearly the same as the generally preferred comment style,
-	 * but there is no initial almost-blank line.
-	 */
-
-It's also important to comment data, whether they are basic types or derived
-types.  To this end, use just one data declaration per line (no commas for
-multiple data declarations).  This leaves you room for a small comment on each
-item, explaining its use.
-
-
-9) You've made a mess of it
----------------------------
-
-That's OK, we all do.  You've probably been told by your long-time Unix
-user helper that ``GNU emacs`` automatically formats the C sources for
-you, and you've noticed that yes, it does do that, but the defaults it
-uses are less than desirable (in fact, they are worse than random
-typing - an infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never
-make a good program).
-
-So, you can either get rid of GNU emacs, or change it to use saner
-values.  To do the latter, you can stick the following in your .emacs file:
-
-.. code-block:: none
-
-  (defun c-lineup-arglist-tabs-only (ignored)
-    "Line up argument lists by tabs, not spaces"
-    (let* ((anchor (c-langelem-pos c-syntactic-element))
-           (column (c-langelem-2nd-pos c-syntactic-element))
-           (offset (- (1+ column) anchor))
-           (steps (floor offset c-basic-offset)))
-      (* (max steps 1)
-         c-basic-offset)))
-
-  (add-hook 'c-mode-common-hook
-            (lambda ()
-              ;; Add kernel style
-              (c-add-style
-               "linux-tabs-only"
-               '("linux" (c-offsets-alist
-                          (arglist-cont-nonempty
-                           c-lineup-gcc-asm-reg
-                           c-lineup-arglist-tabs-only))))))
-
-  (add-hook 'c-mode-hook
-            (lambda ()
-              (let ((filename (buffer-file-name)))
-                ;; Enable kernel mode for the appropriate files
-                (when (and filename
-                           (string-match (expand-file-name "~/src/linux-trees")
-                                         filename))
-                  (setq indent-tabs-mode t)
-                  (setq show-trailing-whitespace t)
-                  (c-set-style "linux-tabs-only")))))
-
-This will make emacs go better with the kernel coding style for C
-files below ``~/src/linux-trees``.
-
-But even if you fail in getting emacs to do sane formatting, not
-everything is lost: use ``indent``.
-
-Now, again, GNU indent has the same brain-dead settings that GNU emacs
-has, which is why you need to give it a few command line options.
-However, that's not too bad, because even the makers of GNU indent
-recognize the authority of K&R (the GNU people aren't evil, they are
-just severely misguided in this matter), so you just give indent the
-options ``-kr -i8`` (stands for ``K&R, 8 character indents``), or use
-``scripts/Lindent``, which indents in the latest style.
-
-``indent`` has a lot of options, and especially when it comes to comment
-re-formatting you may want to take a look at the man page.  But
-remember: ``indent`` is not a fix for bad programming.
-
-
-10) Kconfig configuration files
--------------------------------
-
-For all of the Kconfig* configuration files throughout the source tree,
-the indentation is somewhat different.  Lines under a ``config`` definition
-are indented with one tab, while help text is indented an additional two
-spaces.  Example::
-
-  config AUDIT
-	bool "Auditing support"
-	depends on NET
-	help
-	  Enable auditing infrastructure that can be used with another
-	  kernel subsystem, such as SELinux (which requires this for
-	  logging of avc messages output).  Does not do system-call
-	  auditing without CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL.
-
-Seriously dangerous features (such as write support for certain
-filesystems) should advertise this prominently in their prompt string::
-
-  config ADFS_FS_RW
-	bool "ADFS write support (DANGEROUS)"
-	depends on ADFS_FS
-	...
-
-For full documentation on the configuration files, see the file
-Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt.
-
-
-11) Data structures
--------------------
-
-Data structures that have visibility outside the single-threaded
-environment they are created and destroyed in should always have
-reference counts.  In the kernel, garbage collection doesn't exist (and
-outside the kernel garbage collection is slow and inefficient), which
-means that you absolutely **have** to reference count all your uses.
-
-Reference counting means that you can avoid locking, and allows multiple
-users to have access to the data structure in parallel - and not having
-to worry about the structure suddenly going away from under them just
-because they slept or did something else for a while.
-
-Note that locking is **not** a replacement for reference counting.
-Locking is used to keep data structures coherent, while reference
-counting is a memory management technique.  Usually both are needed, and
-they are not to be confused with each other.
-
-Many data structures can indeed have two levels of reference counting,
-when there are users of different ``classes``.  The subclass count counts
-the number of subclass users, and decrements the global count just once
-when the subclass count goes to zero.
-
-Examples of this kind of ``multi-level-reference-counting`` can be found in
-memory management (``struct mm_struct``: mm_users and mm_count), and in
-filesystem code (``struct super_block``: s_count and s_active).
-
-Remember: if another thread can find your data structure, and you don't
-have a reference count on it, you almost certainly have a bug.
-
-
-12) Macros, Enums and RTL
--------------------------
-
-Names of macros defining constants and labels in enums are capitalized.
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	#define CONSTANT 0x12345
-
-Enums are preferred when defining several related constants.
-
-CAPITALIZED macro names are appreciated but macros resembling functions
-may be named in lower case.
-
-Generally, inline functions are preferable to macros resembling functions.
-
-Macros with multiple statements should be enclosed in a do - while block:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	#define macrofun(a, b, c)			\
-		do {					\
-			if (a == 5)			\
-				do_this(b, c);		\
-		} while (0)
-
-Things to avoid when using macros:
-
-1) macros that affect control flow:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	#define FOO(x)					\
-		do {					\
-			if (blah(x) < 0)		\
-				return -EBUGGERED;	\
-		} while (0)
-
-is a **very** bad idea.  It looks like a function call but exits the ``calling``
-function; don't break the internal parsers of those who will read the code.
-
-2) macros that depend on having a local variable with a magic name:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	#define FOO(val) bar(index, val)
-
-might look like a good thing, but it's confusing as hell when one reads the
-code and it's prone to breakage from seemingly innocent changes.
-
-3) macros with arguments that are used as l-values: FOO(x) = y; will
-bite you if somebody e.g. turns FOO into an inline function.
-
-4) forgetting about precedence: macros defining constants using expressions
-must enclose the expression in parentheses. Beware of similar issues with
-macros using parameters.
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	#define CONSTANT 0x4000
-	#define CONSTEXP (CONSTANT | 3)
-
-5) namespace collisions when defining local variables in macros resembling
-functions:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	#define FOO(x)				\
-	({					\
-		typeof(x) ret;			\
-		ret = calc_ret(x);		\
-		(ret);				\
-	})
-
-ret is a common name for a local variable - __foo_ret is less likely
-to collide with an existing variable.
-
-The cpp manual deals with macros exhaustively. The gcc internals manual also
-covers RTL which is used frequently with assembly language in the kernel.
-
-
-13) Printing kernel messages
-----------------------------
-
-Kernel developers like to be seen as literate. Do mind the spelling
-of kernel messages to make a good impression. Do not use crippled
-words like ``dont``; use ``do not`` or ``don't`` instead.  Make the messages
-concise, clear, and unambiguous.
-
-Kernel messages do not have to be terminated with a period.
-
-Printing numbers in parentheses (%d) adds no value and should be avoided.
-
-There are a number of driver model diagnostic macros in <linux/device.h>
-which you should use to make sure messages are matched to the right device
-and driver, and are tagged with the right level:  dev_err(), dev_warn(),
-dev_info(), and so forth.  For messages that aren't associated with a
-particular device, <linux/printk.h> defines pr_notice(), pr_info(),
-pr_warn(), pr_err(), etc.
-
-Coming up with good debugging messages can be quite a challenge; and once
-you have them, they can be a huge help for remote troubleshooting.  However
-debug message printing is handled differently than printing other non-debug
-messages.  While the other pr_XXX() functions print unconditionally,
-pr_debug() does not; it is compiled out by default, unless either DEBUG is
-defined or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG is set.  That is true for dev_dbg() also,
-and a related convention uses VERBOSE_DEBUG to add dev_vdbg() messages to
-the ones already enabled by DEBUG.
-
-Many subsystems have Kconfig debug options to turn on -DDEBUG in the
-corresponding Makefile; in other cases specific files #define DEBUG.  And
-when a debug message should be unconditionally printed, such as if it is
-already inside a debug-related #ifdef section, printk(KERN_DEBUG ...) can be
-used.
-
-
-14) Allocating memory
----------------------
-
-The kernel provides the following general purpose memory allocators:
-kmalloc(), kzalloc(), kmalloc_array(), kcalloc(), vmalloc(), and
-vzalloc().  Please refer to the API documentation for further information
-about them.
-
-The preferred form for passing a size of a struct is the following:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), ...);
-
-The alternative form where struct name is spelled out hurts readability and
-introduces an opportunity for a bug when the pointer variable type is changed
-but the corresponding sizeof that is passed to a memory allocator is not.
-
-Casting the return value which is a void pointer is redundant. The conversion
-from void pointer to any other pointer type is guaranteed by the C programming
-language.
-
-The preferred form for allocating an array is the following:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	p = kmalloc_array(n, sizeof(...), ...);
-
-The preferred form for allocating a zeroed array is the following:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	p = kcalloc(n, sizeof(...), ...);
-
-Both forms check for overflow on the allocation size n * sizeof(...),
-and return NULL if that occurred.
-
-
-15) The inline disease
-----------------------
-
-There appears to be a common misperception that gcc has a magic "make me
-faster" speedup option called ``inline``. While the use of inlines can be
-appropriate (for example as a means of replacing macros, see Chapter 12), it
-very often is not. Abundant use of the inline keyword leads to a much bigger
-kernel, which in turn slows the system as a whole down, due to a bigger
-icache footprint for the CPU and simply because there is less memory
-available for the pagecache. Just think about it; a pagecache miss causes a
-disk seek, which easily takes 5 milliseconds. There are a LOT of cpu cycles
-that can go into these 5 milliseconds.
-
-A reasonable rule of thumb is to not put inline at functions that have more
-than 3 lines of code in them. An exception to this rule are the cases where
-a parameter is known to be a compiletime constant, and as a result of this
-constantness you *know* the compiler will be able to optimize most of your
-function away at compile time. For a good example of this later case, see
-the kmalloc() inline function.
-
-Often people argue that adding inline to functions that are static and used
-only once is always a win since there is no space tradeoff. While this is
-technically correct, gcc is capable of inlining these automatically without
-help, and the maintenance issue of removing the inline when a second user
-appears outweighs the potential value of the hint that tells gcc to do
-something it would have done anyway.
-
-
-16) Function return values and names
-------------------------------------
-
-Functions can return values of many different kinds, and one of the
-most common is a value indicating whether the function succeeded or
-failed.  Such a value can be represented as an error-code integer
-(-Exxx = failure, 0 = success) or a ``succeeded`` boolean (0 = failure,
-non-zero = success).
-
-Mixing up these two sorts of representations is a fertile source of
-difficult-to-find bugs.  If the C language included a strong distinction
-between integers and booleans then the compiler would find these mistakes
-for us... but it doesn't.  To help prevent such bugs, always follow this
-convention::
-
-	If the name of a function is an action or an imperative command,
-	the function should return an error-code integer.  If the name
-	is a predicate, the function should return a "succeeded" boolean.
-
-For example, ``add work`` is a command, and the add_work() function returns 0
-for success or -EBUSY for failure.  In the same way, ``PCI device present`` is
-a predicate, and the pci_dev_present() function returns 1 if it succeeds in
-finding a matching device or 0 if it doesn't.
-
-All EXPORTed functions must respect this convention, and so should all
-public functions.  Private (static) functions need not, but it is
-recommended that they do.
-
-Functions whose return value is the actual result of a computation, rather
-than an indication of whether the computation succeeded, are not subject to
-this rule.  Generally they indicate failure by returning some out-of-range
-result.  Typical examples would be functions that return pointers; they use
-NULL or the ERR_PTR mechanism to report failure.
-
-
-17) Don't re-invent the kernel macros
--------------------------------------
-
-The header file include/linux/kernel.h contains a number of macros that
-you should use, rather than explicitly coding some variant of them yourself.
-For example, if you need to calculate the length of an array, take advantage
-of the macro
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	#define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0]))
-
-Similarly, if you need to calculate the size of some structure member, use
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	#define FIELD_SIZEOF(t, f) (sizeof(((t*)0)->f))
-
-There are also min() and max() macros that do strict type checking if you
-need them.  Feel free to peruse that header file to see what else is already
-defined that you shouldn't reproduce in your code.
-
-
-18) Editor modelines and other cruft
-------------------------------------
-
-Some editors can interpret configuration information embedded in source files,
-indicated with special markers.  For example, emacs interprets lines marked
-like this:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	-*- mode: c -*-
-
-Or like this:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	/*
-	Local Variables:
-	compile-command: "gcc -DMAGIC_DEBUG_FLAG foo.c"
-	End:
-	*/
-
-Vim interprets markers that look like this:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	/* vim:set sw=8 noet */
-
-Do not include any of these in source files.  People have their own personal
-editor configurations, and your source files should not override them.  This
-includes markers for indentation and mode configuration.  People may use their
-own custom mode, or may have some other magic method for making indentation
-work correctly.
-
-
-19) Inline assembly
--------------------
-
-In architecture-specific code, you may need to use inline assembly to interface
-with CPU or platform functionality.  Don't hesitate to do so when necessary.
-However, don't use inline assembly gratuitously when C can do the job.  You can
-and should poke hardware from C when possible.
-
-Consider writing simple helper functions that wrap common bits of inline
-assembly, rather than repeatedly writing them with slight variations.  Remember
-that inline assembly can use C parameters.
-
-Large, non-trivial assembly functions should go in .S files, with corresponding
-C prototypes defined in C header files.  The C prototypes for assembly
-functions should use ``asmlinkage``.
-
-You may need to mark your asm statement as volatile, to prevent GCC from
-removing it if GCC doesn't notice any side effects.  You don't always need to
-do so, though, and doing so unnecessarily can limit optimization.
-
-When writing a single inline assembly statement containing multiple
-instructions, put each instruction on a separate line in a separate quoted
-string, and end each string except the last with \n\t to properly indent the
-next instruction in the assembly output:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	asm ("magic %reg1, #42\n\t"
-	     "more_magic %reg2, %reg3"
-	     : /* outputs */ : /* inputs */ : /* clobbers */);
-
-
-20) Conditional Compilation
----------------------------
-
-Wherever possible, don't use preprocessor conditionals (#if, #ifdef) in .c
-files; doing so makes code harder to read and logic harder to follow.  Instead,
-use such conditionals in a header file defining functions for use in those .c
-files, providing no-op stub versions in the #else case, and then call those
-functions unconditionally from .c files.  The compiler will avoid generating
-any code for the stub calls, producing identical results, but the logic will
-remain easy to follow.
-
-Prefer to compile out entire functions, rather than portions of functions or
-portions of expressions.  Rather than putting an ifdef in an expression, factor
-out part or all of the expression into a separate helper function and apply the
-conditional to that function.
-
-If you have a function or variable which may potentially go unused in a
-particular configuration, and the compiler would warn about its definition
-going unused, mark the definition as __maybe_unused rather than wrapping it in
-a preprocessor conditional.  (However, if a function or variable *always* goes
-unused, delete it.)
-
-Within code, where possible, use the IS_ENABLED macro to convert a Kconfig
-symbol into a C boolean expression, and use it in a normal C conditional:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SOMETHING)) {
-		...
-	}
-
-The compiler will constant-fold the conditional away, and include or exclude
-the block of code just as with an #ifdef, so this will not add any runtime
-overhead.  However, this approach still allows the C compiler to see the code
-inside the block, and check it for correctness (syntax, types, symbol
-references, etc).  Thus, you still have to use an #ifdef if the code inside the
-block references symbols that will not exist if the condition is not met.
-
-At the end of any non-trivial #if or #ifdef block (more than a few lines),
-place a comment after the #endif on the same line, noting the conditional
-expression used.  For instance:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
-	#ifdef CONFIG_SOMETHING
-	...
-	#endif /* CONFIG_SOMETHING */
-
-
-Appendix I) References
-----------------------
-
-The C Programming Language, Second Edition
-by Brian W. Kernighan and Dennis M. Ritchie.
-Prentice Hall, Inc., 1988.
-ISBN 0-13-110362-8 (paperback), 0-13-110370-9 (hardback).
-
-The Practice of Programming
-by Brian W. Kernighan and Rob Pike.
-Addison-Wesley, Inc., 1999.
-ISBN 0-201-61586-X.
-
-GNU manuals - where in compliance with K&R and this text - for cpp, gcc,
-gcc internals and indent, all available from http://www.gnu.org/manual/
-
-WG14 is the international standardization working group for the programming
-language C, URL: http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/
-
-Kernel CodingStyle, by greg@kroah.com at OLS 2002:
-http://www.kroah.com/linux/talks/ols_2002_kernel_codingstyle_talk/html/