diff options
author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2018-01-10 11:17:21 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2018-01-10 11:17:21 -0500 |
commit | 661e4e33a984fbd05e6b573ce4bb639ca699c130 (patch) | |
tree | 421a7e3828bc73daae816e5cd8aa91403aa5a12d | |
parent | 4512c43eac7e007d982e7ea45152ea6f3f4d1921 (diff) | |
parent | 290af86629b25ffd1ed6232c4e9107da031705cb (diff) | |
download | op-kernel-dev-661e4e33a984fbd05e6b573ce4bb639ca699c130.zip op-kernel-dev-661e4e33a984fbd05e6b573ce4bb639ca699c130.tar.gz |
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf 2018-01-09
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree.
The main changes are:
1) Prevent out-of-bounds speculation in BPF maps by masking the
index after bounds checks in order to fix spectre v1, and
add an option BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON into Kconfig that allows for
removing the BPF interpreter from the kernel in favor of
JIT-only mode to make spectre v2 harder, from Alexei.
2) Remove false sharing of map refcount with max_entries which
was used in spectre v1, from Daniel.
3) Add a missing NULL psock check in sockmap in order to fix
a race, from John.
4) Fix test_align BPF selftest case since a recent change in
verifier rejects the bit-wise arithmetic on pointers
earlier but test_align update was missing, from Alexei.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/bpf.h | 26 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | init/Kconfig | 7 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 47 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/core.c | 19 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/sockmap.c | 11 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 36 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/test_bpf.c | 11 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | net/core/filter.c | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | net/core/sysctl_net_core.c | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | net/socket.c | 9 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c | 22 |
11 files changed, 150 insertions, 50 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index b63a592..0b25cf8 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -43,7 +43,14 @@ struct bpf_map_ops { }; struct bpf_map { - atomic_t refcnt; + /* 1st cacheline with read-mostly members of which some + * are also accessed in fast-path (e.g. ops, max_entries). + */ + const struct bpf_map_ops *ops ____cacheline_aligned; + struct bpf_map *inner_map_meta; +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY + void *security; +#endif enum bpf_map_type map_type; u32 key_size; u32 value_size; @@ -52,15 +59,17 @@ struct bpf_map { u32 pages; u32 id; int numa_node; - struct user_struct *user; - const struct bpf_map_ops *ops; - struct work_struct work; + bool unpriv_array; + /* 7 bytes hole */ + + /* 2nd cacheline with misc members to avoid false sharing + * particularly with refcounting. + */ + struct user_struct *user ____cacheline_aligned; + atomic_t refcnt; atomic_t usercnt; - struct bpf_map *inner_map_meta; + struct work_struct work; char name[BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN]; -#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY - void *security; -#endif }; /* function argument constraints */ @@ -221,6 +230,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux { struct bpf_array { struct bpf_map map; u32 elem_size; + u32 index_mask; /* 'ownership' of prog_array is claimed by the first program that * is going to use this map or by the first program which FD is stored * in the map to make sure that all callers and callees have the same diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig index 690a381..19a6b84 100644 --- a/init/Kconfig +++ b/init/Kconfig @@ -1396,6 +1396,13 @@ config BPF_SYSCALL Enable the bpf() system call that allows to manipulate eBPF programs and maps via file descriptors. +config BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON + bool "Permanently enable BPF JIT and remove BPF interpreter" + depends on BPF_SYSCALL && HAVE_EBPF_JIT && BPF_JIT + help + Enables BPF JIT and removes BPF interpreter to avoid + speculative execution of BPF instructions by the interpreter + config USERFAULTFD bool "Enable userfaultfd() system call" select ANON_INODES diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c index 7c25426..aaa3198 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c @@ -53,9 +53,10 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) { bool percpu = attr->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY; int numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr); + u32 elem_size, index_mask, max_entries; + bool unpriv = !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN); struct bpf_array *array; u64 array_size; - u32 elem_size; /* check sanity of attributes */ if (attr->max_entries == 0 || attr->key_size != 4 || @@ -72,11 +73,20 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) elem_size = round_up(attr->value_size, 8); + max_entries = attr->max_entries; + index_mask = roundup_pow_of_two(max_entries) - 1; + + if (unpriv) + /* round up array size to nearest power of 2, + * since cpu will speculate within index_mask limits + */ + max_entries = index_mask + 1; + array_size = sizeof(*array); if (percpu) - array_size += (u64) attr->max_entries * sizeof(void *); + array_size += (u64) max_entries * sizeof(void *); else - array_size += (u64) attr->max_entries * elem_size; + array_size += (u64) max_entries * elem_size; /* make sure there is no u32 overflow later in round_up() */ if (array_size >= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE) @@ -86,6 +96,8 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) array = bpf_map_area_alloc(array_size, numa_node); if (!array) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + array->index_mask = index_mask; + array->map.unpriv_array = unpriv; /* copy mandatory map attributes */ array->map.map_type = attr->map_type; @@ -121,12 +133,13 @@ static void *array_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key) if (unlikely(index >= array->map.max_entries)) return NULL; - return array->value + array->elem_size * index; + return array->value + array->elem_size * (index & array->index_mask); } /* emit BPF instructions equivalent to C code of array_map_lookup_elem() */ static u32 array_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_insn *insn_buf) { + struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map); struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf; u32 elem_size = round_up(map->value_size, 8); const int ret = BPF_REG_0; @@ -135,7 +148,12 @@ static u32 array_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_insn *insn_buf) *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, map_ptr, offsetof(struct bpf_array, value)); *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, ret, index, 0); - *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, ret, map->max_entries, 3); + if (map->unpriv_array) { + *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, ret, map->max_entries, 4); + *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, ret, array->index_mask); + } else { + *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, ret, map->max_entries, 3); + } if (is_power_of_2(elem_size)) { *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, ret, ilog2(elem_size)); @@ -157,7 +175,7 @@ static void *percpu_array_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key) if (unlikely(index >= array->map.max_entries)) return NULL; - return this_cpu_ptr(array->pptrs[index]); + return this_cpu_ptr(array->pptrs[index & array->index_mask]); } int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value) @@ -177,7 +195,7 @@ int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value) */ size = round_up(map->value_size, 8); rcu_read_lock(); - pptr = array->pptrs[index]; + pptr = array->pptrs[index & array->index_mask]; for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { bpf_long_memcpy(value + off, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), size); off += size; @@ -225,10 +243,11 @@ static int array_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, return -EEXIST; if (array->map.map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY) - memcpy(this_cpu_ptr(array->pptrs[index]), + memcpy(this_cpu_ptr(array->pptrs[index & array->index_mask]), value, map->value_size); else - memcpy(array->value + array->elem_size * index, + memcpy(array->value + + array->elem_size * (index & array->index_mask), value, map->value_size); return 0; } @@ -262,7 +281,7 @@ int bpf_percpu_array_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, */ size = round_up(map->value_size, 8); rcu_read_lock(); - pptr = array->pptrs[index]; + pptr = array->pptrs[index & array->index_mask]; for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { bpf_long_memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value + off, size); off += size; @@ -613,6 +632,7 @@ static void *array_of_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key) static u32 array_of_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_insn *insn_buf) { + struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map); u32 elem_size = round_up(map->value_size, 8); struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf; const int ret = BPF_REG_0; @@ -621,7 +641,12 @@ static u32 array_of_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, map_ptr, offsetof(struct bpf_array, value)); *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, ret, index, 0); - *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, ret, map->max_entries, 5); + if (map->unpriv_array) { + *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, ret, map->max_entries, 6); + *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, ret, array->index_mask); + } else { + *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, ret, map->max_entries, 5); + } if (is_power_of_2(elem_size)) *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, ret, ilog2(elem_size)); else diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index 86b50aa..51ec2dd 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -767,6 +767,7 @@ noinline u64 __bpf_call_base(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__bpf_call_base); +#ifndef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON /** * __bpf_prog_run - run eBPF program on a given context * @ctx: is the data we are operating on @@ -1317,6 +1318,14 @@ EVAL6(PROG_NAME_LIST, 224, 256, 288, 320, 352, 384) EVAL4(PROG_NAME_LIST, 416, 448, 480, 512) }; +#else +static unsigned int __bpf_prog_ret0(const void *ctx, + const struct bpf_insn *insn) +{ + return 0; +} +#endif + bool bpf_prog_array_compatible(struct bpf_array *array, const struct bpf_prog *fp) { @@ -1364,9 +1373,13 @@ static int bpf_check_tail_call(const struct bpf_prog *fp) */ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_select_runtime(struct bpf_prog *fp, int *err) { +#ifndef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON u32 stack_depth = max_t(u32, fp->aux->stack_depth, 1); fp->bpf_func = interpreters[(round_up(stack_depth, 32) / 32) - 1]; +#else + fp->bpf_func = __bpf_prog_ret0; +#endif /* eBPF JITs can rewrite the program in case constant * blinding is active. However, in case of error during @@ -1376,6 +1389,12 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_select_runtime(struct bpf_prog *fp, int *err) */ if (!bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(fp->aux)) { fp = bpf_int_jit_compile(fp); +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON + if (!fp->jited) { + *err = -ENOTSUPP; + return fp; + } +#endif } else { *err = bpf_prog_offload_compile(fp); if (*err) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c index 5ee2e41..1712d31 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c @@ -591,8 +591,15 @@ static void sock_map_free(struct bpf_map *map) write_lock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock); psock = smap_psock_sk(sock); - smap_list_remove(psock, &stab->sock_map[i]); - smap_release_sock(psock, sock); + /* This check handles a racing sock event that can get the + * sk_callback_lock before this case but after xchg happens + * causing the refcnt to hit zero and sock user data (psock) + * to be null and queued for garbage collection. + */ + if (likely(psock)) { + smap_list_remove(psock, &stab->sock_map[i]); + smap_release_sock(psock, sock); + } write_unlock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock); } rcu_read_unlock(); diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 04b2487..b414d6b 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -1729,6 +1729,13 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx) err = check_func_arg(env, BPF_REG_2, fn->arg2_type, &meta); if (err) return err; + if (func_id == BPF_FUNC_tail_call) { + if (meta.map_ptr == NULL) { + verbose(env, "verifier bug\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].map_ptr = meta.map_ptr; + } err = check_func_arg(env, BPF_REG_3, fn->arg3_type, &meta); if (err) return err; @@ -4456,6 +4463,35 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) */ insn->imm = 0; insn->code = BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL; + + /* instead of changing every JIT dealing with tail_call + * emit two extra insns: + * if (index >= max_entries) goto out; + * index &= array->index_mask; + * to avoid out-of-bounds cpu speculation + */ + map_ptr = env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].map_ptr; + if (map_ptr == BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON) { + verbose(env, "tail_call obusing map_ptr\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (!map_ptr->unpriv_array) + continue; + insn_buf[0] = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_3, + map_ptr->max_entries, 2); + insn_buf[1] = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_3, + container_of(map_ptr, + struct bpf_array, + map)->index_mask); + insn_buf[2] = *insn; + cnt = 3; + new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt); + if (!new_prog) + return -ENOMEM; + + delta += cnt - 1; + env->prog = prog = new_prog; + insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta; continue; } diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c index 9e97480..f369889 100644 --- a/lib/test_bpf.c +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c @@ -6250,9 +6250,8 @@ static struct bpf_prog *generate_filter(int which, int *err) return NULL; } } - /* We don't expect to fail. */ if (*err) { - pr_cont("FAIL to attach err=%d len=%d\n", + pr_cont("FAIL to prog_create err=%d len=%d\n", *err, fprog.len); return NULL; } @@ -6276,6 +6275,10 @@ static struct bpf_prog *generate_filter(int which, int *err) * checks. */ fp = bpf_prog_select_runtime(fp, err); + if (*err) { + pr_cont("FAIL to select_runtime err=%d\n", *err); + return NULL; + } break; } @@ -6461,8 +6464,8 @@ static __init int test_bpf(void) pass_cnt++; continue; } - - return err; + err_cnt++; + continue; } pr_cont("jited:%u ", fp->jited); diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index 6a85e67..d339ef1 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -1054,11 +1054,9 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_migrate_filter(struct bpf_prog *fp) */ goto out_err_free; - /* We are guaranteed to never error here with cBPF to eBPF - * transitions, since there's no issue with type compatibility - * checks on program arrays. - */ fp = bpf_prog_select_runtime(fp, &err); + if (err) + goto out_err_free; kfree(old_prog); return fp; diff --git a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c index cbc3dde..a47ad6c 100644 --- a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c +++ b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c @@ -325,7 +325,13 @@ static struct ctl_table net_core_table[] = { .data = &bpf_jit_enable, .maxlen = sizeof(int), .mode = 0644, +#ifndef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON .proc_handler = proc_dointvec +#else + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax, + .extra1 = &one, + .extra2 = &one, +#endif }, # ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EBPF_JIT { diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c index 05f361f..78acd6c 100644 --- a/net/socket.c +++ b/net/socket.c @@ -2619,6 +2619,15 @@ out_fs: core_initcall(sock_init); /* early initcall */ +static int __init jit_init(void) +{ +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON + bpf_jit_enable = 1; +#endif + return 0; +} +pure_initcall(jit_init); + #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS void socket_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq) { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c index 8591c89..471bbbd 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c @@ -474,27 +474,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .matches = { {4, "R5=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)"}, - /* ptr & 0x40 == either 0 or 0x40 */ - {5, "R5=inv(id=0,umax_value=64,var_off=(0x0; 0x40))"}, - /* ptr << 2 == unknown, (4n) */ - {7, "R5=inv(id=0,smax_value=9223372036854775804,umax_value=18446744073709551612,var_off=(0x0; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"}, - /* (4n) + 14 == (4n+2). We blow our bounds, because - * the add could overflow. - */ - {8, "R5=inv(id=0,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"}, - /* Checked s>=0 */ - {10, "R5=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, - /* packet pointer + nonnegative (4n+2) */ - {12, "R6=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, - {14, "R4=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, - /* NET_IP_ALIGN + (4n+2) == (4n), alignment is fine. - * We checked the bounds, but it might have been able - * to overflow if the packet pointer started in the - * upper half of the address space. - * So we did not get a 'range' on R6, and the access - * attempt will fail. - */ - {16, "R6=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, + /* R5 bitwise operator &= on pointer prohibited */ } }, { |