diff options
author | David Härdeman <david@hardeman.nu> | 2014-04-03 20:31:51 -0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com> | 2014-07-23 21:26:08 -0300 |
commit | af3a4a9bbeb00df3e42e77240b4cdac5479812f9 (patch) | |
tree | c58da3eef556c0122365bd3d0b37243fcf988842 | |
parent | 4dd9bb91bb5dc44e3f8c23c60a0ba432e50d7488 (diff) | |
download | op-kernel-dev-af3a4a9bbeb00df3e42e77240b4cdac5479812f9.zip op-kernel-dev-af3a4a9bbeb00df3e42e77240b4cdac5479812f9.tar.gz |
[media] dib0700: NEC scancode cleanup
the RC RX packet is defined as:
struct dib0700_rc_response {
...
u8 not_system;
u8 system;
...
u8 data;
u8 not_data;
The NEC protocol transmits in the order:
system
not_system
data
not_data
Note that the code defines the NEC extended scancode as:
scancode = be16_to_cpu(poll_reply->system16) << 8 | poll_reply->data;
i.e.
scancode = poll_reply->not_system << 16 |
poll_reply->system << 8 |
poll_reply->data;
Which, if the order *is* reversed, would mean that the scancode that
gets defined is in reality:
scancode = poll_reply->system << 16 |
poll_reply->not_system << 8 |
poll_reply->data;
Which is the same as the order used in drivers/media/rc/ir-nec-decoder.c.
This patch changes the code to match my assumption (the generated scancode
should, however, not change).
[m.chehab@samsung.com: rebased and fixed the decoding error message]
Signed-off-by: David Härdeman <david@hardeman.nu>
CC: Patrick Boettcher <pboettcher@kernellabs.com>
Tested-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c | 36 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c b/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c index c14285f..38b151f 100644 --- a/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c +++ b/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c @@ -658,13 +658,8 @@ out: struct dib0700_rc_response { u8 report_id; u8 data_state; - union { - u16 system16; - struct { - u8 not_system; - u8 system; - }; - }; + u8 system; + u8 not_system; u8 data; u8 not_data; }; @@ -710,20 +705,29 @@ static void dib0700_rc_urb_completion(struct urb *purb) toggle = 0; /* NEC protocol sends repeat code as 0 0 0 FF */ - if ((poll_reply->system == 0x00) && (poll_reply->data == 0x00) - && (poll_reply->not_data == 0xff)) { + if (poll_reply->system == 0x00 && + poll_reply->not_system == 0x00 && + poll_reply->data == 0x00 && + poll_reply->not_data == 0xff) { poll_reply->data_state = 2; break; } - if ((poll_reply->system ^ poll_reply->not_system) != 0xff) { + if ((poll_reply->data ^ poll_reply->not_data) != 0xff) { + deb_data("NEC32 protocol\n"); + keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC32(poll_reply->system << 24 | + poll_reply->not_system << 16 | + poll_reply->data << 8 | + poll_reply->not_data); + } else if ((poll_reply->system ^ poll_reply->not_system) != 0xff) { deb_data("NEC extended protocol\n"); - /* NEC extended code - 24 bits */ - keycode = be16_to_cpu(poll_reply->system16) << 8 | poll_reply->data; + keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NECX(poll_reply->system << 8 | + poll_reply->not_system, + poll_reply->data); } else { deb_data("NEC normal protocol\n"); - /* normal NEC code - 16 bits */ - keycode = poll_reply->system << 8 | poll_reply->data; + keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC(poll_reply->system, + poll_reply->data); } break; @@ -738,8 +742,8 @@ static void dib0700_rc_urb_completion(struct urb *purb) if ((poll_reply->data + poll_reply->not_data) != 0xff) { /* Key failed integrity check */ - err("key failed integrity check: %04x %02x %02x", - poll_reply->system, + err("key failed integrity check: %02x %02x %02x %02x", + poll_reply->system, poll_reply->not_system, poll_reply->data, poll_reply->not_data); goto resubmit; } |