From bc5f92e5db6f303e73387278e32f8669f0abf0e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Armbruster Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:24:49 +0100 Subject: qxl: Fix SPICE_RING_PROD_ITEM(), SPICE_RING_CONS_ITEM() sanity check The pointer arithmetic there is safe, but ugly. Coverity grouses about it. However, the actual comparison is off by one: <= end instead of < end. Fix by rewriting the check in a cleaner way. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann --- hw/qxl.c | 20 ++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) (limited to 'hw') diff --git a/hw/qxl.c b/hw/qxl.c index 00e517a..e8f380b 100644 --- a/hw/qxl.c +++ b/hw/qxl.c @@ -37,33 +37,25 @@ */ #undef SPICE_RING_PROD_ITEM #define SPICE_RING_PROD_ITEM(qxl, r, ret) { \ - typeof(r) start = r; \ - typeof(r) end = r + 1; \ uint32_t prod = (r)->prod & SPICE_RING_INDEX_MASK(r); \ - typeof(&(r)->items[prod]) m_item = &(r)->items[prod]; \ - if (!((uint8_t*)m_item >= (uint8_t*)(start) && (uint8_t*)(m_item + 1) <= (uint8_t*)(end))) { \ + if (prod >= ARRAY_SIZE((r)->items)) { \ qxl_set_guest_bug(qxl, "SPICE_RING_PROD_ITEM indices mismatch " \ - "! %p <= %p < %p", (uint8_t *)start, \ - (uint8_t *)m_item, (uint8_t *)end); \ + "%u >= %zu", prod, ARRAY_SIZE((r)->items)); \ ret = NULL; \ } else { \ - ret = &m_item->el; \ + ret = &(r)->items[prod].el; \ } \ } #undef SPICE_RING_CONS_ITEM #define SPICE_RING_CONS_ITEM(qxl, r, ret) { \ - typeof(r) start = r; \ - typeof(r) end = r + 1; \ uint32_t cons = (r)->cons & SPICE_RING_INDEX_MASK(r); \ - typeof(&(r)->items[cons]) m_item = &(r)->items[cons]; \ - if (!((uint8_t*)m_item >= (uint8_t*)(start) && (uint8_t*)(m_item + 1) <= (uint8_t*)(end))) { \ + if (cons >= ARRAY_SIZE((r)->items)) { \ qxl_set_guest_bug(qxl, "SPICE_RING_CONS_ITEM indices mismatch " \ - "! %p <= %p < %p", (uint8_t *)start, \ - (uint8_t *)m_item, (uint8_t *)end); \ + "%u >= %zu", cons, ARRAY_SIZE((r)->items)); \ ret = NULL; \ } else { \ - ret = &m_item->el; \ + ret = &(r)->items[cons].el; \ } \ } -- cgit v1.1