From c227f0995e1722a1abccc28cadf0664266bd8043 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anthony Liguori Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:12:16 -0500 Subject: Revert "Get rid of _t suffix" In the very least, a change like this requires discussion on the list. The naming convention is goofy and it causes a massive merge problem. Something like this _must_ be presented on the list first so people can provide input and cope with it. This reverts commit 99a0949b720a0936da2052cb9a46db04ffc6db29. Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori --- hw/fw_cfg.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'hw/fw_cfg.c') diff --git a/hw/fw_cfg.c b/hw/fw_cfg.c index bd57416..37fe3b3 100644 --- a/hw/fw_cfg.c +++ b/hw/fw_cfg.c @@ -116,18 +116,18 @@ static void fw_cfg_io_writew(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t value) fw_cfg_select(opaque, (uint16_t)value); } -static uint32_t fw_cfg_mem_readb(void *opaque, a_target_phys_addr addr) +static uint32_t fw_cfg_mem_readb(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr) { return fw_cfg_read(opaque); } -static void fw_cfg_mem_writeb(void *opaque, a_target_phys_addr addr, +static void fw_cfg_mem_writeb(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr, uint32_t value) { fw_cfg_write(opaque, (uint8_t)value); } -static void fw_cfg_mem_writew(void *opaque, a_target_phys_addr addr, +static void fw_cfg_mem_writew(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr, uint32_t value) { fw_cfg_select(opaque, (uint16_t)value); @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ int fw_cfg_add_callback(void *opaque, uint16_t key, FWCfgCallback callback, } void *fw_cfg_init(uint32_t ctl_port, uint32_t data_port, - a_target_phys_addr ctl_addr, a_target_phys_addr data_addr) + target_phys_addr_t ctl_addr, target_phys_addr_t data_addr) { FWCfgState *s; int io_ctl_memory, io_data_memory; -- cgit v1.1