From 0421c67c02273ff49db63c5b6c25db3292032038 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hongxu Jia Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 18:59:57 +0800 Subject: elfutils: upgrade to 1.161 Drop PREFERRED_VERSION_elfutils in meta/conf/distro/include/ tcmode-default.inc, it builds the latest version by default. (From OE-Core rev: 7ff30c54439a761d66fd4ceca80073e3653373bf) Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- .../elfutils/elfutils-0.161/fixheadercheck.patch | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/elfutils/elfutils-0.161/fixheadercheck.patch (limited to 'meta/recipes-devtools/elfutils/elfutils-0.161/fixheadercheck.patch') diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/elfutils/elfutils-0.161/fixheadercheck.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/elfutils/elfutils-0.161/fixheadercheck.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8796e9a --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/elfutils/elfutils-0.161/fixheadercheck.patch @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +For some binaries we can get a invalid section alignment, for example if +sh_align = 1 and sh_addralign is 0. In the case of a zero size section like +".note.GNU-stack", this is irrelavent as far as I can tell and we shouldn't +error in this case. + +RP 2014/6/11 + +Upstream-Status: Pending + +Index: elfutils-0.158/libelf/elf32_updatenull.c +=================================================================== +--- elfutils-0.158.orig/libelf/elf32_updatenull.c 2012-12-14 22:40:48.000000000 +0000 ++++ elfutils-0.158/libelf/elf32_updatenull.c 2014-06-11 16:35:43.417386291 +0000 +@@ -327,8 +327,8 @@ + we test for the alignment of the section being large + enough for the largest alignment required by a data + block. */ +- if (unlikely (! powerof2 (shdr->sh_addralign)) +- || unlikely (shdr->sh_addralign < sh_align)) ++ if (shdr->sh_size && (unlikely (! powerof2 (shdr->sh_addralign)) ++ || unlikely (shdr->sh_addralign < sh_align))) + { + __libelf_seterrno (ELF_E_INVALID_ALIGN); + return -1; -- cgit v1.1