From fedad51cb4e141fd9157813ff30e0521cf994f95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Hatle Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 13:39:07 -0500 Subject: binutils: Inform binutils that armv5e really is valid! A comment in the binutils sources indicate that it should support all of the -march= parameters that gcc supports. The tune validations noted that gas failed on -march=armv5e. It is not yet clear to me if this patch belongs upstream or not. (From OE-Core rev: 4f2503ebdb5c491b758cbdf6eb7df96d4295c24f) Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- .../binutils/binutils/binutils-armv5e.patch | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/binutils-armv5e.patch (limited to 'meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils') diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/binutils-armv5e.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/binutils-armv5e.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4ac1a9c --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/binutils-armv5e.patch @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +Add the armv5e architecture to binutils + +Binutils has a comment that indicates it is supposed to match gcc for all of +the support "-march=" settings, but it was lacking the armv5e setting. This +was a simple way to add it, as thumb instructions shouldn't be generated by +the compiler anyway. + +Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle + +diff -urN binutils-2.22.orig/gas/config/tc-arm.c binutils-2.22/gas/config/tc-arm.c +--- binutils-2.22.orig/gas/config/tc-arm.c 2011-11-21 03:29:31.000000000 -0600 ++++ binutils-2.22/gas/config/tc-arm.c 2012-04-03 12:07:42.230158760 -0500 +@@ -22990,6 +22990,7 @@ + {"armv4t", ARM_ARCH_V4T, FPU_ARCH_FPA}, + {"armv4txm", ARM_ARCH_V4TxM, FPU_ARCH_FPA}, + {"armv5", ARM_ARCH_V5, FPU_ARCH_VFP}, ++ {"armv5e", ARM_ARCH_V5TE, FPU_ARCH_VFP}, + {"armv5t", ARM_ARCH_V5T, FPU_ARCH_VFP}, + {"armv5txm", ARM_ARCH_V5TxM, FPU_ARCH_VFP}, + {"armv5te", ARM_ARCH_V5TE, FPU_ARCH_VFP}, -- cgit v1.1