diff options
author | Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> | 2012-06-09 09:42:59 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> | 2012-06-11 13:49:49 +0100 |
commit | 00330a3ad0db9437a5bcb3b71fe00bed4e085768 (patch) | |
tree | 9880d7b6bb2838ee131a2e6dbab563b9553a1b10 /meta | |
parent | 665f9083875a79aa8ba1690cb3b4f315d17738e5 (diff) | |
download | ast2050-yocto-poky-00330a3ad0db9437a5bcb3b71fe00bed4e085768.zip ast2050-yocto-poky-00330a3ad0db9437a5bcb3b71fe00bed4e085768.tar.gz |
binutils_2.22: Backport to fix bogus textrels
This is reported by prelinker which does not
go well with textrels.
(From OE-Core rev: 7b1caeca8e5c0dd066bb940fe6d2dff4d22bf816)
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'meta')
-rw-r--r-- | meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0001-PR-ld-13470.patch | 82 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.22.bb | 3 |
2 files changed, 84 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0001-PR-ld-13470.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0001-PR-ld-13470.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0a0e064 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0001-PR-ld-13470.patch @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +From 82fdddd1c4e37881db9b4c6a944261521c6f10ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> +Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 00:57:59 +0000 +Subject: [PATCH] PR ld/13470 * elf32-ppc.c + (ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Revert substantive + change in 2011-07-01 commit. Comment. * + elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Likewise. + +--- + bfd/ChangeLog | 7 +++++++ + bfd/elf32-ppc.c | 14 ++++++++++---- + bfd/elf64-ppc.c | 14 ++++++++++---- + 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) + + +Upstream-Status: Backport + +Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> +Index: binutils-2.22/bfd/elf32-ppc.c +=================================================================== +--- binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf32-ppc.c 2011-11-21 01:29:21.000000000 -0800 ++++ binutils-2.22/bfd/elf32-ppc.c 2012-05-31 14:28:48.273784929 -0700 +@@ -2987,10 +2987,6 @@ + edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt; + edir->elf.pointer_equality_needed |= eind->elf.pointer_equality_needed; + +- /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. */ +- if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect) +- return; +- + if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL) + { + if (edir->dyn_relocs != NULL) +@@ -3022,6 +3018,16 @@ + eind->dyn_relocs = NULL; + } + ++ /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. ++ You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over; After all, ++ both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just ++ moving reloc accounting around. However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS ++ code in ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for ++ dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the ++ DIR sym here. */ ++ if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect) ++ return; ++ + /* Copy over the GOT refcount entries that we may have already seen to + the symbol which just became indirect. */ + edir->elf.got.refcount += eind->elf.got.refcount; +Index: binutils-2.22/bfd/elf64-ppc.c +=================================================================== +--- binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf64-ppc.c 2011-11-21 01:29:24.000000000 -0800 ++++ binutils-2.22/bfd/elf64-ppc.c 2012-05-31 14:28:48.285784951 -0700 +@@ -4435,10 +4435,6 @@ + edir->elf.ref_regular_nonweak |= eind->elf.ref_regular_nonweak; + edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt; + +- /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. */ +- if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect) +- return; +- + /* Copy over any dynamic relocs we may have on the indirect sym. */ + if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL) + { +@@ -4471,6 +4467,16 @@ + eind->dyn_relocs = NULL; + } + ++ /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. ++ You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over; After all, ++ both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just ++ moving reloc accounting around. However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS ++ code in ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for ++ dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the ++ DIR sym here. */ ++ if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect) ++ return; ++ + /* Copy over got entries that we may have already seen to the + symbol which just became indirect. */ + if (eind->elf.got.glist != NULL) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.22.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.22.bb index 9f62883..7b6adef 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.22.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.22.bb @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ require binutils.inc -PR = "r8" +PR = "r9" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM="\ file://src-release;endline=17;md5=4830a9ef968f3b18dd5e9f2c00db2d35\ @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\ file://binutils-powerpc-e5500.patch \ file://binutils-armv5e.patch \ file://mips64-default-ld-emulation.patch \ + file://0001-PR-ld-13470.patch \ " SRC_URI[md5sum] = "ee0f10756c84979622b992a4a61ea3f5" |