From a06287c9a04cfb055be958839ec18ce5e091c7fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:01:33 +0000 Subject: Switch SST49LF004A/B to block erase, remove the hack which simulated (unsupported) chip erase Annotate SST49LF004B quirks for TBL#. Add TEST_OK_PRW which is useful when a PREW chip gets a new erase routine. Change a few erase function prototypes to use unsigned int instead of int. Corresponding to flashrom svn r731. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Acked-by: Luc Verhaegen --- flashchips.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'flashchips.c') diff --git a/flashchips.c b/flashchips.c index 83f6e96..1292d3e 100644 --- a/flashchips.c +++ b/flashchips.c @@ -2141,6 +2141,9 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { }, { + /* Contrary to the data sheet, TBL# on the SST49LF004B affects the top 128kB (instead of 64kB) + * and is only honored for 64k block erase, but not 4k sector erase. + */ .vendor = "SST", .name = "SST49LF004A/B", .bustype = CHIP_BUSTYPE_FWH, /* A/A Mux */ @@ -2151,7 +2154,20 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .tested = TEST_OK_PREW, .probe = probe_sst_fwhub, .probe_timing = 1, /* 150 ns | routine is wrapper to probe_jedec (sst_fwhub.c) */ - .erase = erase_sst_fwhub, + .erase = NULL, + .block_erasers = + { + { + .eraseblocks = { {4 * 1024, 128} }, + .block_erase = erase_sector_jedec, /* missing unlock */ + }, { + .eraseblocks = { {64 * 1024, 8} }, + .block_erase = erase_sst_fwhub_block, /* same as erase_sector_block, but with unlock */ + }, { + .eraseblocks = { {512 * 1024, 1} }, + .block_erase = NULL, /* AA 55 80 AA 55 10, only in PP mode */ + }, + }, .write = write_sst_fwhub, .read = read_memmapped, }, -- cgit v1.1