From 3a25fea9e7726109df0c09aaacefb446ab1a9d0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 11:02:33 +0000 Subject: The SPI opcode 0xd8 is not a chip erase opcode on any chip out there Besides that, the function as implemented just walks the chip and ignores sector sizes. Sector erase with SPI opcode 0xd8 is of course still supported. Kill a declaration for a nonexisting function while we're at it. Corresponding to flashrom svn r1054. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Acked-by: Sean Nelson --- chipdrivers.h | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'chipdrivers.h') diff --git a/chipdrivers.h b/chipdrivers.h index 7339e2d..aeee095 100644 --- a/chipdrivers.h +++ b/chipdrivers.h @@ -35,8 +35,6 @@ int spi_write_enable(void); int spi_write_disable(void); int spi_chip_erase_60(struct flashchip *flash); int spi_chip_erase_c7(struct flashchip *flash); -int spi_chip_erase_60_c7(struct flashchip *flash); -int spi_chip_erase_d8(struct flashchip *flash); int spi_block_erase_20(struct flashchip *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen); int spi_block_erase_52(struct flashchip *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen); int spi_block_erase_d7(struct flashchip *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen); -- cgit v1.1