Remove erase_chip_stm50flw0x0x

As the comment indicates, that function is not a chip erase function
at all, but a function calling a block eraser in a loop. So it adds
no extra value to what we already have in the block_eraser
infrastructure.

Furthermore, that function assumes a uniform sector size layout, but
is referenced from flash chip with non-uniform sector size layout, which
is just wrong.

Corresponding to flashrom svn r1287.

Signed-off-by: Michael Karcher <flashrom@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 27 deletions

diff --git a/stm50flw0x0x.c b/stm50flw0x0x.c
index 60e5c45..726a882 100644
--- a/stm50flw0x0x.c
+++ b/stm50flw0x0x.c
@@ -114,30 +114,3 @@ int erase_sector_stm50flw0x0x(struct flashchip *flash, unsigned int sector, unsi
 
 	return 0;
 }
-
-/* FIXME: This function is not a real chip erase function. */
-int erase_chip_stm50flw0x0x(struct flashchip *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen)
-{
-	int i;
-	int total_size = flash->total_size * 1024;
-	int page_size = flash->page_size;
-
-	if ((addr != 0) || (blocklen != flash->total_size * 1024)) {
-		msg_cerr("%s called with incorrect arguments\n",
-			__func__);
-		return -1;
-	}
-
-	for (i = 0; i < total_size / page_size; i++) {
-		//if (unlock_block_stm50flw0x0x(flash, i * page_size)) {
-		//	msg_cerr("UNLOCK FAILED!\n");
-		//	return -1;
-		//}
-		if (erase_block_82802ab(flash, i * page_size, page_size)) {
-			msg_cerr("ERASE FAILED!\n");
-			return -1;
-		}
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}