1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
|
//===-- SIFixSGPRLiveRanges.cpp - Fix SGPR live ranges ----------------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
/// \file SALU instructions ignore the execution mask, so we need to modify the
/// live ranges of the registers they define in some cases.
///
/// The main case we need to handle is when a def is used in one side of a
/// branch and not another. For example:
///
/// %def
/// IF
/// ...
/// ...
/// ELSE
/// %use
/// ...
/// ENDIF
///
/// Here we need the register allocator to avoid assigning any of the defs
/// inside of the IF to the same register as %def. In traditional live
/// interval analysis %def is not live inside the IF branch, however, since
/// SALU instructions inside of IF will be executed even if the branch is not
/// taken, there is the chance that one of the instructions will overwrite the
/// value of %def, so the use in ELSE will see the wrong value.
///
/// The strategy we use for solving this is to add an extra use after the ENDIF:
///
/// %def
/// IF
/// ...
/// ...
/// ELSE
/// %use
/// ...
/// ENDIF
/// %use
///
/// Adding this use will make the def live throughout the IF branch, which is
/// what we want.
#include "AMDGPU.h"
#include "SIInstrInfo.h"
#include "SIRegisterInfo.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/DepthFirstIterator.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/LiveIntervalAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/LiveVariables.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstrBuilder.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachinePostDominators.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h"
using namespace llvm;
#define DEBUG_TYPE "si-fix-sgpr-live-ranges"
namespace {
class SIFixSGPRLiveRanges : public MachineFunctionPass {
public:
static char ID;
public:
SIFixSGPRLiveRanges() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) {
initializeSIFixSGPRLiveRangesPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
}
bool runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) override;
const char *getPassName() const override {
return "SI Fix SGPR live ranges";
}
void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override {
AU.addRequired<LiveVariables>();
AU.addPreserved<LiveVariables>();
AU.addRequired<MachinePostDominatorTree>();
AU.addPreserved<MachinePostDominatorTree>();
AU.setPreservesCFG();
MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU);
}
};
} // End anonymous namespace.
INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(SIFixSGPRLiveRanges, DEBUG_TYPE,
"SI Fix SGPR Live Ranges", false, false)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LiveVariables)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(MachinePostDominatorTree)
INITIALIZE_PASS_END(SIFixSGPRLiveRanges, DEBUG_TYPE,
"SI Fix SGPR Live Ranges", false, false)
char SIFixSGPRLiveRanges::ID = 0;
char &llvm::SIFixSGPRLiveRangesID = SIFixSGPRLiveRanges::ID;
FunctionPass *llvm::createSIFixSGPRLiveRangesPass() {
return new SIFixSGPRLiveRanges();
}
bool SIFixSGPRLiveRanges::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
MachineRegisterInfo &MRI = MF.getRegInfo();
const TargetInstrInfo *TII = MF.getSubtarget().getInstrInfo();
const SIRegisterInfo *TRI = static_cast<const SIRegisterInfo *>(
MF.getSubtarget().getRegisterInfo());
bool MadeChange = false;
MachinePostDominatorTree *PDT = &getAnalysis<MachinePostDominatorTree>();
SmallVector<unsigned, 16> SGPRLiveRanges;
LiveVariables *LV = &getAnalysis<LiveVariables>();
MachineBasicBlock *Entry = &MF.front();
// Use a depth first order so that in SSA, we encounter all defs before
// uses. Once the defs of the block have been found, attempt to insert
// SGPR_USE instructions in successor blocks if required.
for (MachineBasicBlock *MBB : depth_first(Entry)) {
for (const MachineInstr &MI : *MBB) {
for (const MachineOperand &MO : MI.defs()) {
// We should never see a live out def of a physical register, so we also
// do not need to worry about implicit_defs().
unsigned Def = MO.getReg();
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(Def)) {
if (TRI->isSGPRClass(MRI.getRegClass(Def))) {
// Only consider defs that are live outs. We don't care about def /
// use within the same block.
// LiveVariables does not consider registers that are only used in a
// phi in a sucessor block as live out, unlike LiveIntervals.
//
// This is OK because SIFixSGPRCopies replaced any SGPR phis with
// VGPRs.
if (LV->isLiveOut(Def, *MBB))
SGPRLiveRanges.push_back(Def);
}
}
}
}
if (MBB->succ_size() < 2)
continue;
// We have structured control flow, so the number of successors should be
// two.
assert(MBB->succ_size() == 2);
MachineBasicBlock *SuccA = *MBB->succ_begin();
MachineBasicBlock *SuccB = *(++MBB->succ_begin());
MachineBasicBlock *NCD = PDT->findNearestCommonDominator(SuccA, SuccB);
if (!NCD)
continue;
MachineBasicBlock::iterator NCDTerm = NCD->getFirstTerminator();
if (NCDTerm != NCD->end() && NCDTerm->getOpcode() == AMDGPU::SI_ELSE) {
assert(NCD->succ_size() == 2);
// We want to make sure we insert the Use after the ENDIF, not after
// the ELSE.
NCD = PDT->findNearestCommonDominator(*NCD->succ_begin(),
*(++NCD->succ_begin()));
}
for (unsigned Reg : SGPRLiveRanges) {
// FIXME: We could be smarter here. If the register is Live-In to one
// block, but the other doesn't have any SGPR defs, then there won't be a
// conflict. Also, if the branch condition is uniform then there will be
// no conflict.
bool LiveInToA = LV->isLiveIn(Reg, *SuccA);
bool LiveInToB = LV->isLiveIn(Reg, *SuccB);
if (!LiveInToA && !LiveInToB) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << PrintReg(Reg, TRI, 0)
<< " is live into neither successor\n");
continue;
}
if (LiveInToA && LiveInToB) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << PrintReg(Reg, TRI, 0)
<< " is live into both successors\n");
continue;
}
// This interval is live in to one successor, but not the other, so
// we need to update its range so it is live in to both.
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Possible SGPR conflict detected for "
<< PrintReg(Reg, TRI, 0)
<< " BB#" << SuccA->getNumber()
<< ", BB#" << SuccB->getNumber()
<< " with NCD = BB#" << NCD->getNumber() << '\n');
assert(TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(Reg) &&
"Not expecting to extend live range of physreg");
// FIXME: Need to figure out how to update LiveRange here so this pass
// will be able to preserve LiveInterval analysis.
MachineInstr *NCDSGPRUse =
BuildMI(*NCD, NCD->getFirstNonPHI(), DebugLoc(),
TII->get(AMDGPU::SGPR_USE))
.addReg(Reg, RegState::Implicit);
MadeChange = true;
LV->HandleVirtRegUse(Reg, NCD, NCDSGPRUse);
DEBUG(NCDSGPRUse->dump());
}
}
return MadeChange;
}
|