From a0fb00f9837bd0d2e5948f16f6a6b82a7a628f51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dim <dim@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:09:03 +0000
Subject: Vendor import of clang trunk r126547:
 http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@126547

---
 test/SemaCXX/undefined-internal.cpp | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)

(limited to 'test/SemaCXX/undefined-internal.cpp')

diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/undefined-internal.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/undefined-internal.cpp
index bb87ce0..e926f18 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/undefined-internal.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/undefined-internal.cpp
@@ -84,3 +84,41 @@ namespace test5 {
     B<A>::foo(); // expected-note {{used here}}
   }
 }
+
+namespace test6 {
+  template <class T> struct A {
+    static const int zero = 0;
+    static const int one = 1;
+    static const int two = 2;
+
+    int value;
+
+    A() : value(zero) {
+      value = one;
+    }
+  };
+
+  namespace { struct Internal; }
+
+  void test() {
+    A<Internal> a;
+    a.value = A<Internal>::two;
+  }
+}
+
+// We support (as an extension) private, undefined copy constructors when
+// a temporary is bound to a reference even in C++98. Similarly, we shouldn't
+// warn about this copy constructor being used without a definition.
+namespace PR9323 {
+  namespace {
+    struct Uncopyable {
+      Uncopyable() {}
+    private:
+      Uncopyable(const Uncopyable&); // expected-note {{declared private here}}
+    };
+  }
+  void f(const Uncopyable&) {}
+  void test() {
+    f(Uncopyable()); // expected-warning {{C++98 requires an accessible copy constructor}}
+  };
+}
-- 
cgit v1.1