From c72c57c9e9b69944e3e009cd5e209634839581d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dim <dim@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 18:45:10 +0000
Subject: Vendor import of clang trunk r178860:
 http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178860

---
 test/CodeGenCXX/pragma-weak.cpp | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 test/CodeGenCXX/pragma-weak.cpp

(limited to 'test/CodeGenCXX/pragma-weak.cpp')

diff --git a/test/CodeGenCXX/pragma-weak.cpp b/test/CodeGenCXX/pragma-weak.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ed537ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/CodeGenCXX/pragma-weak.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+#pragma weak zex
+int zex;
+// GCC produces a weak symbol for this because it matches mangled names.
+// Different c++ ABIs may or may not mangle this, so we produce a strong
+// symbol.
+// CHECK: @zex = global i32
+
+#pragma weak foo
+struct S {  void foo(); };
+void S::foo() {}
+// CHECK: define void @_ZN1S3fooEv(
+
+#pragma weak zed
+namespace bar {  void zed() {} }
+// CHECK: define void @_ZN3bar3zedEv(
+
+#pragma weak bah
+void bah() {}
+// CHECK: define void @_Z3bahv(
+
+#pragma weak baz
+extern "C" void baz() {}
+// CHECK: define weak void @baz(
+
+#pragma weak _Z3baxv
+void bax() {}
+// GCC produces a weak symbol for this one, but it doesn't look like a good
+// idea to expose the mangling to the pragma unless we really have to.
+// CHECK: define void @_Z3baxv(
-- 
cgit v1.1