From ea266cad53e3d49771fa38103913d3ec7a166694 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dim <dim@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 20:45:12 +0000
Subject: Vendor import of clang tags/RELEASE_33/final r183502 (effectively,
3.3 release):
http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/tags/RELEASE_33/final@183502
---
test/Analysis/reference.cpp | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
(limited to 'test/Analysis/reference.cpp')
diff --git a/test/Analysis/reference.cpp b/test/Analysis/reference.cpp
index 8dd0baf..1dabe7b 100644
--- a/test/Analysis/reference.cpp
+++ b/test/Analysis/reference.cpp
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ void testRetroactiveNullReference(int *x) {
// "null reference". So the 'if' statement ought to be dead code.
// However, Clang (and other compilers) don't actually check that a pointer
// value is non-null in the implementation of references, so it is possible
- // to produce a supposed "null reference" at runtime. The analyzer shoeuld
+ // to produce a supposed "null reference" at runtime. The analyzer should
// still warn when it can prove such errors.
int &y = *x;
if (x != 0)
@@ -224,3 +224,13 @@ namespace rdar11212286 {
return *x; // no-warning
}
}
+
+namespace PR15694 {
+ class C {
+ bool bit : 1;
+ template <class T> void bar(const T &obj) {}
+ void foo() {
+ bar(bit); // don't crash
+ }
+ };
+}
--
cgit v1.1