From 8cc770d042cd8fffb166d2ee65abffe944e7ee7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ed Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:15:34 +0000 Subject: Fix two small typo's in comments in the nullfs vnops code. Submitted by: Jille Timmermans --- sys/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'sys/fs/nullfs') diff --git a/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c b/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c index ca7ed0c..4a41396 100644 --- a/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c +++ b/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ null_islocked(struct vop_islocked_args *ap) /* * There is no way to tell that someone issued remove/rmdir operation - * on the underlying filesystem. For now we just have to release lowevrp + * on the underlying filesystem. For now we just have to release lowervp * as soon as possible. * * Note, we can't release any resources nor remove vnode from hash before @@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ null_reclaim(struct vop_reclaim_args *ap) lockmgr(vp->v_vnlock, LK_EXCLUSIVE | LK_INTERLOCK, VI_MTX(vp)); vput(lowervp); } else - panic("null_reclaim: reclaiming an node with now lowervp"); + panic("null_reclaim: reclaiming a node with no lowervp"); FREE(xp, M_NULLFSNODE); return (0); -- cgit v1.1