From 894449cd93a70b82e4c6349b4a39db9744f1d10c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sos <sos@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:26:35 +0000
Subject: Use UMA instead of plain malloc for getting ATA request storage. This
 gives +10% performance on simple tests, so definitly worth it. A few percent
 more could be had by not using M_ZERO'd alloc's, but we then need to clear
 fields all over the place to be safe, and that was deemed not worth the
 trouble (and it makes life dangerous).

---
 sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

(limited to 'sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c')

diff --git a/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c b/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c
index 5e26c22..d695b47 100644
--- a/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c
+++ b/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
 #include <sys/lock.h>
 #include <sys/mutex.h>
 #include <sys/sema.h>
+#include <vm/uma.h>
 #include <machine/bus.h>
 
 #include <cam/cam.h>
-- 
cgit v1.1