From 1743de6ff752e8adcec27843073ec529059d9928 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: peter Date: Sat, 29 Mar 1997 12:35:06 +0000 Subject: Be a bit more careful about what port number we are using for the second socket. If we're going to check for reserved ports, we should do it properly. --- libexec/rshd/rshd.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'libexec') diff --git a/libexec/rshd/rshd.c b/libexec/rshd/rshd.c index 2e95a77..b90214d 100644 --- a/libexec/rshd/rshd.c +++ b/libexec/rshd/rshd.c @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ * OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF * SUCH DAMAGE. * - * $Id: rshd.c,v 1.13 1997/02/22 14:22:23 peter Exp $ + * $Id: rshd.c,v 1.14 1997/03/28 15:48:17 imp Exp $ */ #ifndef lint @@ -303,8 +303,12 @@ doit(fromp) #ifdef KERBEROS if (!use_kerberos) #endif - if (port >= IPPORT_RESERVED) { - syslog(LOG_ERR, "2nd port not reserved\n"); + if (port >= IPPORT_RESERVED || + port < IPPORT_RESERVED/2) { + syslog(LOG_NOTICE|LOG_AUTH, + "2nd socket from %s on unreserved port %u", + inet_ntoa(fromp->sin_addr), + port); exit(1); } fromp->sin_port = htons(port); -- cgit v1.1