From 15ee484f9917ffcca40218921d373189e9fe4aba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: kib Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:16:25 +0000 Subject: MFC r323597: Handle freeaddrinfo(NULL). --- lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.3 | 13 ++++++++++++- lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.c | 9 ++++----- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.3 b/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.3 index 7380428..fdfaddb 100644 --- a/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.3 +++ b/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.3 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ .\" .\" $FreeBSD$ .\" -.Dd December 21, 2015 +.Dd September 13, 2017 .Dt GETADDRINFO 3 .Os .Sh NAME @@ -351,6 +351,17 @@ pointer should be a .Li addrinfo structure created by a call to .Fn getaddrinfo . +.Sh IMPLEMENTATION NOTES +The behavior of +.Li freeadrinfo(NULL) +is left unspecified by both +.St -susv4 +and +.Dv "RFC 3493" . +The current implementation ignores a +.Dv NULL +argument for compatibility with programs that rely on the implementation +details of other operating systems. .Sh RETURN VALUES .Fn getaddrinfo returns zero on success or one of the error codes listed in diff --git a/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.c b/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.c index 5988ebc..d705028 100644 --- a/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.c +++ b/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.c @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ * in the source code. This is because RFC2553 is silent about which error * code must be returned for which situation. * - freeaddrinfo(NULL). RFC2553 is silent about it. XNET 5.2 says it is - * invalid. current code - SEGV on freeaddrinfo(NULL) + * invalid. Current code accepts NULL to be compatible with other OSes. * * Note: * - The code filters out AFs that are not supported by the kernel, @@ -359,14 +359,13 @@ freeaddrinfo(struct addrinfo *ai) { struct addrinfo *next; - do { + while (ai != NULL) { next = ai->ai_next; - if (ai->ai_canonname) - free(ai->ai_canonname); + free(ai->ai_canonname); /* no need to free(ai->ai_addr) */ free(ai); ai = next; - } while (ai); + } } static int -- cgit v1.1